Sort:  

too many assumptions in the first minute of the vid

"people got along with each other before government"; no, they didn't...any museum worth it's salt has a skull that was bashed in millienia before anyone had said the word government

There are always going to be bandits; government does not create the bandits, but bandits will infest government when the citizenry does not perform their own self-defense duties

when bandits don't have government, it is up to people (who become "citizens" under government, although it's exactly the same group of folks), to bear arms and maintain vigilance against banditry, then kill bandits where they attack.

in ether case, people must defend themselves

When government is used, it is again up to the citizens to keep bandits out of government, and kill them where they infect it by paying attention to politics and watering the tree of liberty as necessary

there is no magical utopia where people hold hands and sing cumbiya...government does not create this magical utopia either

all government is is a "dangerous tool"; it is a extension of humanity as it is

anyone who wants to be left alone needs a large armory, government or not.

this is sloppy, but it should serve as a post on it's own. thanks for the inspiration!

you're a braindead zombie that believe government is a necessary evil

snort, I was going to state specifically that government is NOT a "necessary evil" because I thought you were adult enough to understand that, but congratulations for putting the words in my mouth that you want to argue against

Good luck on your own Utopia!

btw, how are you going to get me to participate in your political fantasy other than use of force?

hopefully, you understand to just leave me out of it ;>

a better inspiration:
Why running around calling folks zombies and sheeple helps me convince those folks that my ideology, which most of those folks already hold a suspicious view of, is superior to theirs

With special bonus inspiration:
why ignoring everything those folks say to argue against what I really want to argue is a superior tactic in such convincing

;>

Yeahhhhhh, anarchism is policy, enforced by force.

except I never said that...you interpreted that the way you wanted to read it

pure anarchy is at the far right of the continuum, meaning no state control; which in practicality results in warlords, or pure banditry

but if you want to pretend that tribal government in Zomia isn't really government, go right ahead LOL; if you want to further pretend there isn't inter-tribal conflict, please continue

It's your fantasy. I'd hate to disrupt that! It's nice to be the supramoral and ultraintellectual hero defeating the powers of evil via strawman and bold statement, isn't it?

or wait, are you in mama's basement smoking weed and dreaming about that sweeet UBI check that real anarchy is going to give you without any effort on your own part?

until you started calling voluntary interactions compulsory,

which I didn't. but you wanted it to be so so you could pretend you had an argument

if you can't understand why I'm mocking you and your willful ignorance at this point, maybe you should go to a post where they upvote you for mindlessly shouting anarchy rules

I quit taking you seriously a few posts back, when you simultaneously put words in my mouth and claimed that I was ignoring your argument.

you are a joke, and it is obnoxious, self-righteous clowns like you that have done so much damage to the image as anarchy as a political philosophy

but keep on responding, and I'll keep on trolling you