Another suggestion I just thought of.
accounts like @familyprotection which are mainly used for # tagging them and mentions to gain it's attention are not publishers of content.
What if you took emailed article/ post submissions for @familyprotection to publish on their own profile with accreditations and a % you set of all earnings of the published posts going back to the author?
This way @ familyprotection would have more power over reward pool distribution and possibly an easier way to stop the #familyprotection tag abuse than going through and checking all the times the tag and your profile is tagged.
Could be worthless in the long run if ALL posts using #familyprotection had to go through this republishing process under the @ amilyprotection profile, but at least this way there is a greater incentive for participants to make a really good submission and send it over.
Also being able to prevent some abuse of the tag by having the article sent back after you guys review it and decide not to publish. Whilst the author can still publish their post after @ familyprotection chooses not to publish it, if they use the #familyprotection tag for it anyway, the main user will be focusing on giving their likes/reposts to submitted articles and posts that they publish themselves.
just an idea.
It is an interesting idea, but we do not have enough volunteer hours to manage that. And if volunteers took the time to do this type of job, there is zero pay in it for them.
A shame, but i totally understand. Now i'm back to full-time wage slaving i barely have the will to even write content on here anymore.
Good luck!