The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone decides that something did not happen, because they cannot personally understand how it could happen.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
The argument from incredulity is a logical fallacy that occurs when someone decides that something did not happen, because they cannot personally understand how it could happen.
Im not claiming it didnt happen. I am saying that I find it unlikely do to my own eexperiences.
well yeah..you are claiming it didn't happen...
so quit weasel wording..
if you want some verification send the poor lady an email
and some money
she could use some.
I am "weasel wording" because you are claiming I am invoking a logical fallacy and those are fighting words. You cannot expect to point out fallacious reasoning(which i have shown is inaccurate) without having a comeback.
so you admit it.
So you like to point out the obvious.
guess so...call me captain obvious.
I would, but everytime I'd end up invoking this guy: @captainobvious