I do not think it should be eliminated, it must be modified, finally if there are children at risk, the point is that from the beginning to the present they are abusing by separating by any action instead of betting on the family constitution offering first psychological care, therapies playful for infants, religious therapy, social help.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You said well, but it might interest you to know that for several years modification has taken place.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Child_Protective_Services
Still nothing has changed, some children have lost their lives, reports of rape and all of that. So why do they decieve themselves as child protectors.
Thank you for that wonderful contribution.