" Agents of State acted..."
My point is that the state is nothing more than an agreement. It is the corrupt, evil persons conspiring to act on behalf of the 'state' that did you harm, not a claim, paper, or anything else
Actual persons did the actual harm to you. The state, all governments, corporations, and other agreements are merely mechanisms they use to do their harm.
They are members of a conspiracy, called the state, that they claim, maybe even believe, as you seem to, is responsible for the harm they actually, personally commit.
Nothing was done to you except by the hands of actual persons. Their claims of just following orders are vapid, nothing more substantial than wind whispering in an abyss of misdirection.
If @bob and I agree that we have authority to take your money, because we create a government, Theftopia, and then @bob clocks you on the noggin and pilfers your wallet, Theftopia didn't do it.
@bob, and maybe me too, did it.
I am not sure that you make the problem what it really is. Your offer still is wrong since the State is a body of people. And when it acts as a State, it is an entity. When it renders someone Stateless that is an act by State.
ALL of which matters and in that State is also to blame AND accounts.
Your offers look to change the problem into something less tangible. State has obligations.
You offered this as well "Even anarchy and the complete cessation of states will not solve the problems, because the psychopaths will remain even after they most useful tool has been abolished."
I never said it would. And this is NOT Anarchy this is intentional acts by the State body or part of that body to do wrong. It can't work and the fact the body of State is culpable matters too. See that?
"Actual persons did the actual harm to you. The state, all governments, corporations, and other agreements are merely mechanisms they use to do their harm." Not really, the State is a body of people and laws that would obviate, prosecute, and admit the harms. Again your offer is in error.
Yes people acted BUT in some cases State acted.
You modify the problem into what it is not. Akn to a slur. Avoid doing that on those grounds.
"Nothing was done to you except by the hands of actual persons" Not true. Again you are wrong.
And also know that State adopts and employs a femme fatale model. Wants to play victim on it and offered this is punitive. Ouch. PLUS the length of time says State is moving new people into and out of the problems. State is acting.
You will have to concede that.
"My point is that the state is nothing more than an agreement." Not true in total. You look to change that to mean they have law to support this, they do not.
State's acts are two fold. AND they have a straw man I can attach, 1) overt act 2) defaults and denials of service.
Both or either can be charged. And must be.
They can be charged akin to a person based on their straw man. All that can be done for and to you legally can be done to State with some exceptions related to health and a human body.
You can't murder the state. You can disestablish it this way. Difference between flesh and rock.
I don't mind the dialog, since this allows me to point out some of the problems with this, BUT your point is flawed related to State. AND the logic matters.