My vote on this comment does not mean I support the contents of the article. Actually I think (with only a light read) that the main article is mostly tripe. Firstly, why the emphasis on children? I think we are at a time where quite clearly 'survival imperative' of humanity as a whole is being 'overmet'; a unique time when we could choose to live for ourselves, rather than 'bringing a child into an increasingly broken world'. I realise that only a small percentage of humanity will be able to process the above without resorting to a zealous online rage. Give it some thought tho. Secondly. Am I wrong or is the article generally quite narrow-minded and quite 'thinly veiled' contempt of 'changes' to the status quo?
For instance. Like Logan Paul, whose content is only ever intended for entertainment, there is little proposal of something different, and 'assurances' that basically I'm a 'nice guy'...
Anyway.
Lots of ladies loving the post so its gotta be right, right?
You have to learn to distinguish reality from tripe. Why not try to fix the broken world. That is what I am trying to do instead of advocating stopping people from bringing children into a broken world.
Give this some thought bro... Do not give up on trying to change the world for the better!