If that's the "narrative" you're going with, I would be careful about making claims about it being factual or based on real events. There could be a level of liability only telling one side of a story like that. Generally mid to higher level production teams like to explore nuance instead of whitewashing events to create an infallible hero. It kind of screams paid shill and might get tuned out by the wider crypto community. Or worse, if fraudulent information presented as fact were used to onboard people, that could also be another layer of liability that could have blowback on the production team.
Food for Thought. Information is Currency.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
We intend to be very careful, it is based of the real events but is a dramatisation so can have poetic licence. Cheers for the advice mate, you are right we really have to be aware of the risks.
Yeah I understand your position too with needing backing. I wonder if anyone would tell you the real story about what happened because if you think it's all David and Goliath, you might need another read of the situation. There are a lot of blurred lines in everything that happened and much of the problems were created because of a handshake understanding which was not written into code. Its really easy for people to feel burned by what happened and there's nothing wrong with feeling that way but those emotions can easily distort a person's perception of what happened.