You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Why Build Finally Network?

in #finallynetwork6 years ago

There is a lot to like about the idea of Finally Network, and you lay out the reasons for its development well. There are, however, important parts missing from this post, to my mind.

I know you didn't originally write this post as a Utopian post, which I would guess is why you didn't use the template. But it would be good to add the repository link. I only know for sure that this is an open source project because I looked at your previous post. Speaking of the previous post. As this is clearly a series, it should have a link to that post. Without it, this post is a bit confusing.

One thing that interests me, as someone who has a website, is static areas. Stuff like "about" and "contact" that shouldn't be pushed down as new posts come in. I hope that's something you're working on. In the previous post, you mentioned "portfolio posts," but that seems to be about recent posts.

The post had some issues of style and grammar, and I would recommend working to clean those up in future posts in the series. You're presenting a major new dApp, and want the presentation to be as effective as possible. I'm happy to provide specific examples in a follow-up comment if wanted.

Your contribution has been evaluated according to Utopian policies and guidelines, as well as a predefined set of questions pertaining to the category.

To view those questions and the relevant answers related to your post, click here.


Need help? Write a ticket on https://support.utopian.io/.
Chat with us on Discord.
[utopian-moderator]

Sort:  

Thanks for taking a look at the post. I'll take a look at the recommend template before working on another update post.

Speaking of the previous post. As this is clearly a series, it should have a link to that post. Without it, this post is a bit confusing.

Thanks, will make it more clear which posts are relevant.

One thing that interests me, as someone who has a website, is static areas. Stuff like "about" and "contact" that shouldn't be pushed down as new posts come in. I hope that's something you're working on. In the previous post, you mentioned "portfolio posts," but that seems to be about recent posts.

Static areas (when ready) will be static as expected

In the previous post, you mentioned "portfolio posts," but that seems to be about recent posts.

"Portfolio" will be a new style of theme. Extra options will be added to display content via

  • latest posts
  • selecting X number of previous posts individually to be displayed.
  • selecting a specific hashtag

The post had some issues of style and grammar, and I would recommend working to clean those up in future posts in the series. You're presenting a major new dApp, and want the presentation to be as effective as possible. I'm happy to provide specific examples in a follow-up comment if wanted.

Yes please, if you have suggestions feel free to let me know.

Thanks again 🚀

Here are some examples of sentences that could have been better:

  • "It’s important to be clear with the intention behind this project from the start and share my reasoning and ideas behind creating this platform." Two issues here. First, it badly needs a comma before "and." Also, I would write "clear about," not "clear with."

  • "The solutions to these problems should be the guide to creating this platform." This is just a clunky sentence. How about: "The solutions to these problems should serve as a guide in creating this platform."?

  • "If the problems aren’t worth solving then perhaps the platform is not worth creating?" Comma before "then." Or even instead of "then."

  • "I believe If the Steem network wants to grow it needs to be a more integral part of a creators platform." A few issues. "I believe that if" work better. There should be a comma before "it." "Creators" should be "creators'"

These are just examples. The biggest takeaway is that if you would make a short pause while saying a sentence, you should probably put a comma there when you write it.

Thank you for your review, @didic!

So far this week you've reviewed 14 contributions. Keep up the good work!