No. I'll flag bernz whenever I want, I'm not a paid shill. There is no guarantee that you are the designated negotiator and that means he can break the deal whenever he wants. I'll take mine in writing, signed and notarized or no deal.
Terms to be negotiated.
Greetings,
Onno.
You and @mitrado can flag whoever you want, and they can flag you in return.. the deal is off if ftg then defends your unprovoked continued trolling and flagging. It’s pretty simple.
Details are all there.. they are on chain.
I’m not speaking for Bernie or ftg, as both will have to comment here for this to be legitimate.
Do as you wish, the agreement above is just asking for a commitment by two individuals.
Following that deal bernie would have a green light to keep bullying and flagging everyone he doesn't agree with, except 10 users.
You need to try harder.
Actually that’s nowhere in the deal.. and I don’t actually have to try at all, for the record.
If you have an issue with him, message him and get it figured out. This isn’t about random flags, it’s about an ongoing feud where many are being harmed as collateral damage (as in your case).
Don’t come to me and tell me what I need to do, I’ve flagged inappropriate comments and had the balls to say enough is enough. Be a part of the solution or get out of the way.
Edit:
for the accounts who will show up to make this something else as they probably would get bored without this drama, no where above does it say that ftg (or anyone else) can not defend a flag that is seen as bullying or disagreeing with beliefs. **It simply says that flags made to accounts for instigating things (details above) cannot be defended.
pretty simple
It's the whole deal, at least that's how I interpret your words:
This is not about whoever you're including in the "each other" group.
This is about stopping opinion flags against every single user of the platform.
I edited above, defending flags is fine.. just not to accounts who are instigating it (as detailed above)
I know @mitrado and I put my hands on the fire that he never attacked or flagged without being provoked first.
This is an attempt to move forward.. “who started it” is sort of not important now. People can refuse to move past it, that’s their choice. No guarantee this will last longer than the last one, but it seems not attempting peace is not beneficial for anyone.
Unprovoked?!? Get real!
See, this is why you can't be the negotiator, you didn't do your homework or you are biased.
This is going forward, as I stated.. this isn’t a judge and jury to decide past events. “Unprovoked instigating going forward will be flagged and a counter to that flag will be a break of the truce”
I can include additional wording to show this is about future actions, not past if that’s helpful.
For now I'll stick to signed and notarized or I will have nothing to enforce the deal with. In essence you offer us nothing.
After all this shit you didn't think I was going by his word did you?
The contract is the blockchain, better than any piece of paper or notary. It cannot be altered, removed or argued against it’s there forever. It’s witnessed by a user base of thousands and anyone can access it.
As I stated.. the agreement above is asking for two individuals to agree here. What the rest of the platform does is up to each individual.
I was just clarifying as I didn’t want anything to be miscommunicated.
Thanks,
Justine
A deal with an anonymous entity is unenforceable and thus meaningless, regardless how it was recorded.
Greetings,
Onno.