Thanks for the additional information. I was looking for some more details as to how it worked, as the GitHub issues was not too explicit how it would play out. Do you happen to have specific links to information that I could go learn more from? I would like to verify that this is what could happen and that it's worse so it can be ruled out. Thanks!
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I don't know of anything beyond the github issue at this point. There were some discussions in other forums (slack, etc) as well, but I don't think slack was keeping history beyond a certain point in time. Anyways, IIRC, there was a pretty thorough discussion by posters for and against the proposal in the comments section of the github issue. But in practice, I think the idea was simple: you could allocate a portion of your SP to nullify an equivalent portion of someone else's SP: every time they voted/downvoted that portion would silently be canceled by using some of your voting power. So if you allocated as much SP as that user had, you could effectively render their votes/downvotes worthless (except to temporarily drain your voting power). I believe the idea was to be able to "quiet" perceived trolls.
Very interesting, I would dedicate 100% of my SP to negate your votes. It seems like you are completely out of control as it pertains to upvoting garbage.
https://steemit.com/photography/@wakstim/oen-siren-in-aceh-language
lol
you and transisto must be best buds or something...lol
Keeping your word I suppose...