Why are they lying about the shape of the earth?
Doesn't the amount of effort necessary to maintain this massive conspiracy, require some visible, some evident benefit to the conspirators and what is the benefit to us, having learned this "truth"?
Why should we believe things such as "with other beings entering our world from other dimensions close to ours" as true? Or other amazing claims without proof when such a model requires people to consider visible spheres in the sky, as disks, and stars as lights but not light sources which can be mapped with radio waves, xrays rays, infrared, (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_telescope_types) while the two spheres in your model would require an immense invisible object that would block out the light of the sun on the moon, creating a lunar eclipse? If earth was flat then how do you explain the numerous satellites observable from earth? We can observe them through radio waves, and we can observe them through lasers, or with our own eyes or even with high powered telescopes. Where are the whistleblowers with this amount of effort, considering that all nasa wistle blowers, or other people that were in charge of SPACE and came out giving up thier careers and safety and not disclose anything about earth being flat, but only that we can travel to space, we have talked with aliens, we have the capabilities, and you know what, there is evidence in their disclosures of technology and then it coincides with work being done in public but nothing not one sound bite about flat earth, and where is the evidence of dimension traveling entities, those aren't extraordinary claims?
I try to "believe" as little as possible. Proof is what we should all be seeking. :)
I guess you chose not to watch even the shorter video which answers your specific question. This is a good indication of the level of research you're willing to do at this point. So who is really pretending here? :)
I think your frustration comes from your refusal to investigate thoroughly yourself. If videos as evidence scare you, and my voting how I see fit offends you, then perhaps I'm not the person you should be looking to have a discourse with. :) I'm sure you have better things to do, right? :)
It first involves the intellectual honesty to admit that you've not bothered to investigate these matters in any thorough manner. I cannot educate and converse at the same time. :) There is an information gap that requires bridging, and the fact that you call sharing videos as evidence... "spamming", shows exactly where you're coming from, and the basic level of investigation you're willing to engage in. :)