What does it mean to you to "worship"?
I ask because I'm wondering if someone can study the sun moon and other planets without having "cult" beliefs.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
What does it mean to you to "worship"?
I ask because I'm wondering if someone can study the sun moon and other planets without having "cult" beliefs.
it seems everyone missing the objective and draws their own conclusions , as i stated , a group of globe earthers are suggesting im using cult like tactics , yet they dont seem to understand the origins of their own field of study, haha all because i told them their debunking theories does not prove the earth to be a ball nor flat.
They have no prove of the earth's shape , only cgi and mathematical equations.
Anyone can have a field of study, nothing is wrong with that. Im not against anyones way of life , you want to worship a glass of milk its all good fam , just dont tell me im stupid and a cult member if i dont agree with your idelogies. Thats my message to them , let people enjoy things like how they enjoy living on a ball.
pseudoscience
ˈsjuːdəʊˌsʌɪəns/Submit
noun
a collection of beliefs or practices mistakenly regarded as being based on scientific method.
"the new pseudoscience of ‘counselling’"
What's hilarious is you are literally using cult tactics when you are trying to associate the globe to a cult simply because some of the celestial bodies are named after gods. By your ridiculous cult logic, anyone who uses the days of the week or drives a Mercury vehicle are members of a cult!
Oh the hilarity that you can't even see that!
And the hilarity that you ignore all the evidence of a globe I've provided and just use the cult tactic of meme dropping little psychological sayings instead of providing evidence of the flat earth!
So, when will you show us how the eclipse on January 31st and all the rest to come for the next like 50 years, are predicted on a flat earth? These events ARE predicted! You must think NASA hires psychics or wizards to predict eclipses!
No, we use the globe model to predict eclipses.. and meteor showers.. and moon phases... and comet sightings... and venus sightings and transits... and daylight hours, etc. . Always have. Always will.
Now, lets see how the flat earth predicts all of those things at once. If you can't, yet these things ARE predicted by the globe model and have been predicted for decades and sometimes even centuries in advance, why do you think you have a viable hypothesis?
Sorry, I was wrong, solar eclipses are predicted out by NASA for the next 1000 years using the globe. Think of NASA on the 31st of the month... because they predicted that lunar eclipse you'll see if you are in the right region.
https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/solar-eclipse-charted-for-the-next-1-000-years
@haveyouvisited The Mayans and Egyptians had predicted all of these phenomena that you discuss, without the use of the globe model. And you seem quite obtuse to the occult symbolism that surrounds our modern society, one small example: the Washington monument is a obelisk, related to Osiris, and you can tie this in to the American Freemasonic influence on American culture. And yes, you are correct that the car companies Saturn - and Mercury and the days of the week draw their influence from occult origins, as well as many many other aspects of daily modern life. To anyone with a cursory understanding of these subjects the influence becomes obvious, the largest idol in the world is The Statue of Liberty, who is the Goddess Semiramis, the Queen of Babylon in her current form, holding the eternal flame with thirteen spikes on her head.
It's good to actually research topics before you attempt to mock people in debate, especially on their own blog.
So, first of all, you missed the entire point that the symbolism has exactly zero to do with the shape of the earth.
Secondly, I still don't see you showing me this model they used. You say that the Mayans and the Egyptians predicted all this, yet flat earth still has no model and not even an explanation for these events, let alone a model.
So, it's YOUR contention that they DID predict these events, so lets see the model they used. You do understand that for a hypothesis on the shape of the earth to be viable, it needs a testable model. Then, to be elevated to a theory, that model needs to be testable to comport with observable reality.
Please, no deflection or evasion. Just prove your claim. You say they DID predict them, so show us how they did that on the MODEL of the flat earth.
I suspect I will just get evasion, but all you need to do is to prove your claim. I promise. Show me your model that explains and predicts all of the dozens of observations we see in reality everyday, including this January 31st full moon, lunar eclipse and I will bow to your superior model and become a flat earther.
Will you do the same and become a globe earther if you cannot show this model that predicts these things, but the globe model does show this and I can prove it does?
https://www.denverpost.com/2017/08/17/university-of-colorado-mayans-solar-eclipse-history/
Read it for yourself, the Spanish destroyed most every book in existence, yet from the few books they had left, they predicted the eclipses perfectly. This was through careful observation and study and there is no documentation that shows the Mayans or Egyptians had any beliefs about the shape of the world being round, and much to suggest they used a flat model as every other civilization did, and even the Greeks and Romans did, outside of the Secret Societies.
Unfortunately the vast majority of these civilizations works are destroyed, but you know what is not? - the Chinese - please research 14-17 century
Chinese astronomy and you will see that they also predicted all of these events with superb accuracy and had a firm flat earth model thought this golden age of science. Know who else? - the Vedics, and the entire Indian empire. Basically the whole world knew the Earth was flat until the Modern Europeans came along.
So when you say you can thank NASA for recording information, you come off as pompous and highly unversed in historical astronomy.
And, I did not miss your point, the heliocentric model was developed by the first secret societies known to history, which was the Greek secret circles, and furthered by many occultists, onward through Sir Issac Newton himself. Reading is fun!
So, just to be clear, you have no model, even of the Chinese flat earth model you claim predicts all these events perfectly. If you DID have such a model that works and predicts all these events perfectly, the flat earth movement would be using it and you'd just show it to me.
That's OK. The globe does, and it predicts these events perfectly. Go ahead and get back to me when you have an actual testable hypothesis or even any reasonable explanation for these events, on the flat earth mode. In the meantime, we'll just keep using the perfectly precise model we have that can be forward tested to predict these events, and backtested by anyone who chooses to use the open source information available to everyone and that is easily modeled by anyone, and perfectly explains every natural astronomical event we see.
You're so nice for commenting on this post. For that, I gave you a vote! I just ask for a Follow in return!