There was a French guy, cartographer from XVIII century who was using very simple but incredibly laborious process to measure the curved France/ Europe. His adventures were described in the series "The worst jobs in history". It look like this. Climb the hill, climb another hill (with the equipment), make the triangle, measure the angles. Repeat, climb new hills. And guess what - it was roooound. This experiment could be done today, by any Flat Earther. Try, measure and prove in a month or less. If you like science and cars, you can follow me.
Funny that... there was a recent documentary made in Southern America , using state of the art equipment, telescopes lasers etc, the pieces of land that they were testing were indeed FLAT. Worth a watch. Think it was called convex earth the documentary. Many tests were done. Also here is a map found recently in a temple thousand years old, shows earth flat with more land outer Antarctica. Just how like Admiral Byrd of the US fleet mentioned in a live interview and in his death diaries.
Ahhh, the ridiculous memes, logical fallacies, and insults begin. Give a valid rebuttal of flat earth arguments and you get an in insulting meme, and no actual arguments. In this case, you're just promoting your own content that is actually just an appeal to popularity instead of making an argument about the post.
Typical flat earth thought processes.
Please, I'd love to hear why you believe that a guy interviewing a bunch of people who are unable to science or math changing to a ridiculous and easily rebutted world view proves that a flight landing in Alaska from Asia wouldn't happen on a globe earth.
You don't have an answer to that, you are just using the logical fallacies necessary to get other people to believe such a ridiculous argument.
I'm not confused. It seems you are, as all flat earthers must be.
Your confusion seems to be that a logical fallacy of appeal to popularity is any sort of argument against an emergency landing in Alaska from Asia. That 'was' the topic of my post, and you simply posted a bunch of videos about how and why people became flat earthers- which is an appeal to popularity and not a response to the topic, which is what flat earthers always do when one of their claims is rebutted because they can never ever admit that they are wrong even when it's shown conclusively that they are.
So, since you say that I'm confused, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system an argument against an emergency landing in Alaska being perfectly sound on a globe earth?
Or are you just posting off topic articles to promote your content, instead of having an actual discussion... as flat earthers constantly do in order to avoid actual discussion?
In fact, how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system anything but the logical fallacy of an appeal to popularity?
Thanks MathiasKP, been watching, reading your stuff and it's good. I also subscribed to your YouTube channel, as your info is clear, concise, and fact-based.
Upvoted as a flat Earther because I want to see invalid claims debunked on both sides of the argument. Not everyone is getting their information strictly from YouTube. Many people are researching and doing tests for themselves which will ultimately either prove flat Earth or reinforce the globe model and find a better way to teach it. Either way, NASA needs to be held responsible for the pending chaos. If we had just one believable real photo of the Earth from space (not a composite or artists conception of data) this whole thing would have been over before it started. The flat Earth movement started for a reason and time will tell what the true reason is.
I appreciate the upvote. Hopefully you feel the same way when I drop this truth bomb on you. If you are truly a seeker, this should make you question your belief system ENTIRELY. But if you are merely confirming your bias, you will likely ignore it, as flat earthers do, because..... for accepting such a failed and easily disprovable model, they simply cannot be truth seekers. One can be a globe SKEPTIC and be a truth seeker, but not a flat earther, as it's so easily and handily disproven by thousands of bits of inconvenient facts that flat earthers MUST ignore in order to be flat earthers.
That's why they never want to PROVE the earth is flat, because they can't. They go against thousands of years of science (that they do not even bother to look up) and THEY have the 'burden of proof' to prove the earth is flat, but they never do. They simply use bad math and science to put the globe in doubt. But they NEVER EVER pay attention to the thousands of reasons why flat earth is a FAR FAR worse model. Instead, they accept it unquestioningly.
A RATIONAL position might be something like, "I have a LOT of questions about this globe earth model, but the Flat earth model obviously doesn't work. So, in the meantime, I'll just keep questioning globe earth and try to understand why the model doesn't seem to be working. Maybe there is something I'm missing, or maybe it's neither flat nor round, or there is some other explanation for both models to seem to have so many problems that I might be missing".
It's completely irrational to have 'questions' about a globe earth, but then wholeheartedly ACCEPT a model that is provably FAR FAR worse... and then pile on all sorts of incredible non-science based explanations on top of your failed model to force it to 'fit' into your bias.
It's IMPOSSIBLE to do 'tests' on a failed model. What these people are doing when they do these 'tests' on a failed model is confirming their bias. They are literally PRETENDING that they are doing 'tests'.
It should be fantastically easy to come up with a flat map of a flat world when we have all of the GPS coordinates and distances between points already mapped out for you. The problem is.. is that we don't LIVE on a flat earth. That's why the globe model works so well, why the math for it is built into every GPS system in the world, as well as air autopilot systems, driverless car autopilot system, ship autopilot systems, handheld navigation devices, and every smart phone. And that we live on a round eaerth is why flat earthers cannot come up with a map that even has correct distances between points.
Can you really not see how this is true? That in thousands of years, with all of the modern info we have, with Auto Cad, advanced graphics, computer programs with advanced math and graphics, universities with advanced mathematical programs, etc. that NO ONE has been able to put the math into a computer to get a flat map that is correct? It literally should be fantastically easy. A kid in high school who is above average and questioning the round earth model should have already done it by now. No need for any photos from space. The globe earth map was not created with photos from space. It was created long before even FLIGHT was achieved... because thinking people are able to put such concepts together... but I know you just mentioned that because flat earthers seem to be unable to make a point without bringing up NASA. It's a fallback non-sequitur to which flat earthers base their entire belief system.
Think about that for a minute... or a LOT longer than a minute. With all of the info on the planet at our disposal. With all of the GPS coordinates and known points, with all of the distances between points known.. flat earthers can't put that info into a computer program to come up with a MAP!
There is absolutely no need for photos from space for you to create a map. Seriously. I honestly can't even believe that you think you'd need photos from space to create a map when you have 100% of the information needed to create one in a computer program.
Hell, most of you don't even BELIEVE SPACE EXISTS! So your demand that you need pictures from space before you can make a map makes your map impossible! How convenient for you!
But please share with me why you think you need a photo from space to create a map? What information would that provide you that NOT having such information has brought all flat earth mapmaking to an utter halt without? All the while... millions are using speroidal math in their GPS's to get around the planet perfectly.
You see a dude with a hand-drawn map on a SQUARE piece of paper, with a square Antarctica/ice wall, not done by auto-cad or any other program that anyone can actually check his distances, drawn without longitude and latitude, without a scale of measurements... and you accept it without any question! LOL.
Not to mention that there are virtually NO Flat earthers using this map, but instead using the Azimuthal projection map for their thought experiments.
If this is THE correct flat earth map, why isn't even the FLAT earth community accepting this? (Hint: it might be because it's a hand drawn map on a square piece of paper.)
Also, it CERTAINLY doesn't explain and is in direct contrast to:
MIrror image sundials in northern and southern hemispheres
24 hour days at all the far outside points of his map, all at the same time on their summer solstice, while the CENTER of the map is in darkness during that time
The circumnavigation of Antarctica
The sun setting due west everywhere on the planet on the spring equinox
Star trails in the northern hemisphere going different directions from star trails in ALL countries of the southern hemisphere, and also different at the equator
Why people in the outside edge of that map see all the same stars, spinning in the same direction, but in the CENTER of that map, they see different stars spinning in the opposite direction.
Mirror image equatorial mount telescopes for the different hemispheres
Why the moon appears one direction in the CENTER of that map, but upside down at far outer points of the map.
and I'd have to see his model of the sun and moon over it to see if it explains seasonality, how the sun sets minutes earlier at the bottom of tall buildings, moon phases, etc.
But SOOOO many things still wrong with his map. For instance, until it's on a computer program with correct distances and latitude and longitude, there's no way to tell if it can explain current sea and sailing routes, flight routes, etc.
But it's VERY weird that you accept a dude on YouTube's hand drawn map as THE OFFICIAL MAP OF FLAT EARTH without even being ABLE to check distances, longitude, latitude and such... but REJECT OUTRIGHT thousands of years of science on the topic, accurate globes with accurate distances that explain all of the above, that GPS uses spheroidal math and helps millions of people accurately navigate the earth properly every day, and thousands of other phenomenon that we see every day.
See why you guys have no credibility? You require THOUSANDS of times more evidence for round earth as you do for flat earth. We have a model that explains EVERYTHING that I mentioned perfectly... but without even being ABLE to test this model, you accept it UNCONDITIONALLY as FACT and correct, even though the model CANNOT explain the things that I mentioned just on it's face.
Yup, did you see the recent tests using state of the art equipment from South America? They confirmed that the pieces of land that they were testing were indeed flat, there was no question about it. I think the documentary was called convex earth the documentary. Worth a watch.
What do you mean 'that's all we have to work with so far'? Flat earth belief has been around for thousands of years, and we know EVERY GPS spot on the planet and we know virtually EVERY distance between points, and those that we don't know, we can extrapoloate using SPHEROID MATH!
Without a correct model to work from, you cannot do correct thought experiments for ANY Of the other concepts that you are trying to 'prove'. It's a fourth grade science fair project fail to say that you KNOW your model is incorrect, but to do experiments from it anyway!
So, to say that you understand your maps are all globe projections, but to use them anyway, is really a huge failure on the part of flat earth thought. It says, "Yes, I know that we know all the points and distances on earth; yes, I know that we know all of the countries and their sizes. Yes, I know that we've had thousands of years to think about this. But we just aren't able to come up with a map other than a globe to work with. And we're still going to do flat earth thought experiments using a globe projection map anyway, despite the fact that NO thought experiment can be correct when the model we are using it incorrect. So, instead of focusing on making a correct map, which should be EASY since we have so much information about the world, we're going to repeat incorrect thought experiments over and over, and call you brainwashed if you don't accept them."
Do you see a problem with that?
No, probably not. Because you seem to have just admitted that you don't see a problem with that.
Who says people aren't working on a flat earth map/model that works? I don't see any problem with using something like the AE projection as a basic visual concept to help people understand the possibility of a different model.
Actually there is a map and another from different time periods oldest around 1000 years ago found in Buddhist temple recently, there you can clearly see the flat earth Antarctic surrounding it but also land outside of the wall, like how Admiral Byrd confirmed the US navy Admiral in the 50s.
I have questioned the globe. To conclude that I didn't, then post things that have ZERO TO DO WITH THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH is totally dishonest.
EVERYTHING the government says could be a lie... and we can STILL prove the earth is a globe with scientific inquiry... like they have been doing for a thousand years prior to NASA.
If you were 'doctor truth', you'd be able to separate out conspiracy theories from scientific inquiry. That you are unable or unwilling to do that means that you are either dishonest and only willing to confirm your own bias, or just unable to discern the difference in these two, entirely different issues.
Now, if i WERE using NASA as EVIDENCE of anything, then you could potentially prove my EVIDENCE is incorrect with the proper data, just like I did with YOUR evidence from the DogCam.
But that is not what you are doing. What you are doing is saying "the government lies.. therefore everything they say is a lie".
That is a non-sequitur, and is patently illogical. Stop being dishonest and illogical. I understand that you feel the need to confirm your bias, but take it somewhere else. I'm not interested in your logical fallacies and dishonesty.
The globe was proven a thousand years ago, and science continues to prove it over and over and over and over.
And again, DISPROVING one model and proving another are two entirely different things. You seem to think that if someone doesn't PROVE the globe model (to your satisfaction, of course, since it HAS been proven over and over), then the earth is flat.
It doesn't work that way. YOU need to ALSO prove YOUR model to make the claim that the earth is flat. But you will not do so. YOu simply DOUBT the globe model and ignore the dozens of impossibilities on a flat earth... like YOU even mentioned, 24 hour sunlight in Antarctica is simply impossible on ANY flat earth model.
You can BELIEVE that it's not on SOME fantasy model that has not been invented yet, but that is called faith, and not science. If you want to do faith, go to a church and talk about flat earth. I'm talking science here. And when it comes to science, EACH model has to be EQUALLY proven.
You saying over and over again that there is no curvature, when you can easily prove it yourself with a simple theodolite app, will never overcome the multiple impossibilities of a flat earth.
And since to make a declaration like "The Earth is Flat", well, you need to ACTUALLY prove your model and overcome the it's multiple impossibilities. But you can't overcome them. In fact, you don't even TRY, and your kind is STILL using a GLobe Projection Map because your model is so riciculous. So, why don't you just stop wasting time, period, and prove YOUR flat earth model?
You mean the fake NASA pictures even they have come out and said they are computer generated, there is no real picture of the earth, that's a fact. Every single one are computer generated. From NASA own words. Also look at old photographs of the earth then new ones the land magically triples in size, it's comical. And these are the photographs people like to swear by and say "look a globe" meanwhile even NASA have said these are computer generated and no real photos exist. Fools will be fools.
LOL. When you can't discuss the evidence at hand, be a good little cult follower and yell NASA LIES!!!!!! At every opportunity so you don't have to discuss NON nasa evidence that disproves your nonsense. I LITERALLY said absolutely nothing about NASA! Nothing!!! But your cult talking points require you to screech "NASA lies" like a maniacal cult parrot whenever you are proven wrong.
Flat earth cult rule #1: never EVER discuss the evidence at hand, just screech NASA LIES!!!!!! No matter what!
Let me guess: you are so stupid you think we've only known the earth is round since the fucking KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION??? Bwahahahaahaha. What a good little unthinking cult follower you are. A+++ for doing EXACTLY what the cult has told you to do and say!
There was a French guy, cartographer from XVIII century who was using very simple but incredibly laborious process to measure the curved France/ Europe. His adventures were described in the series "The worst jobs in history". It look like this. Climb the hill, climb another hill (with the equipment), make the triangle, measure the angles. Repeat, climb new hills. And guess what - it was roooound. This experiment could be done today, by any Flat Earther. Try, measure and prove in a month or less. If you like science and cars, you can follow me.
Funny that... there was a recent documentary made in Southern America , using state of the art equipment, telescopes lasers etc, the pieces of land that they were testing were indeed FLAT. Worth a watch. Think it was called convex earth the documentary. Many tests were done. Also here is a map found recently in a temple thousand years old, shows earth flat with more land outer Antarctica. Just how like Admiral Byrd of the US fleet mentioned in a live interview and in his death diaries.
https://steemit.com/flatearth/@flatearth/finding-the-curve-einar-kuusk-flat-earth-documentary
Ahhh, the ridiculous memes, logical fallacies, and insults begin. Give a valid rebuttal of flat earth arguments and you get an in insulting meme, and no actual arguments. In this case, you're just promoting your own content that is actually just an appeal to popularity instead of making an argument about the post.
Typical flat earth thought processes.
Please, I'd love to hear why you believe that a guy interviewing a bunch of people who are unable to science or math changing to a ridiculous and easily rebutted world view proves that a flight landing in Alaska from Asia wouldn't happen on a globe earth.
You don't have an answer to that, you are just using the logical fallacies necessary to get other people to believe such a ridiculous argument.
What? lol I think you might be confused :)
I'm not confused. It seems you are, as all flat earthers must be.
Your confusion seems to be that a logical fallacy of appeal to popularity is any sort of argument against an emergency landing in Alaska from Asia. That 'was' the topic of my post, and you simply posted a bunch of videos about how and why people became flat earthers- which is an appeal to popularity and not a response to the topic, which is what flat earthers always do when one of their claims is rebutted because they can never ever admit that they are wrong even when it's shown conclusively that they are.
So, since you say that I'm confused, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt: how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system an argument against an emergency landing in Alaska being perfectly sound on a globe earth?
Or are you just posting off topic articles to promote your content, instead of having an actual discussion... as flat earthers constantly do in order to avoid actual discussion?
In fact, how is a bunch of interviews about how people came to their belief system anything but the logical fallacy of an appeal to popularity?
Good article showing the error in the Flat Earth story of the Alaska emergency landing.
Thanks MathiasKP, been watching, reading your stuff and it's good. I also subscribed to your YouTube channel, as your info is clear, concise, and fact-based.
Congratulations @kerriknox! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPI like the article. it's clear and to the point. However the upvote and resteem gif is unnecessary for me and distracting.
It's at the very end. What's it distracting you from? :)
Upvoted as a flat Earther because I want to see invalid claims debunked on both sides of the argument. Not everyone is getting their information strictly from YouTube. Many people are researching and doing tests for themselves which will ultimately either prove flat Earth or reinforce the globe model and find a better way to teach it. Either way, NASA needs to be held responsible for the pending chaos. If we had just one believable real photo of the Earth from space (not a composite or artists conception of data) this whole thing would have been over before it started. The flat Earth movement started for a reason and time will tell what the true reason is.
I appreciate the upvote. Hopefully you feel the same way when I drop this truth bomb on you. If you are truly a seeker, this should make you question your belief system ENTIRELY. But if you are merely confirming your bias, you will likely ignore it, as flat earthers do, because..... for accepting such a failed and easily disprovable model, they simply cannot be truth seekers. One can be a globe SKEPTIC and be a truth seeker, but not a flat earther, as it's so easily and handily disproven by thousands of bits of inconvenient facts that flat earthers MUST ignore in order to be flat earthers.
That's why they never want to PROVE the earth is flat, because they can't. They go against thousands of years of science (that they do not even bother to look up) and THEY have the 'burden of proof' to prove the earth is flat, but they never do. They simply use bad math and science to put the globe in doubt. But they NEVER EVER pay attention to the thousands of reasons why flat earth is a FAR FAR worse model. Instead, they accept it unquestioningly.
A RATIONAL position might be something like, "I have a LOT of questions about this globe earth model, but the Flat earth model obviously doesn't work. So, in the meantime, I'll just keep questioning globe earth and try to understand why the model doesn't seem to be working. Maybe there is something I'm missing, or maybe it's neither flat nor round, or there is some other explanation for both models to seem to have so many problems that I might be missing".
It's completely irrational to have 'questions' about a globe earth, but then wholeheartedly ACCEPT a model that is provably FAR FAR worse... and then pile on all sorts of incredible non-science based explanations on top of your failed model to force it to 'fit' into your bias.
It's IMPOSSIBLE to do 'tests' on a failed model. What these people are doing when they do these 'tests' on a failed model is confirming their bias. They are literally PRETENDING that they are doing 'tests'.
It should be fantastically easy to come up with a flat map of a flat world when we have all of the GPS coordinates and distances between points already mapped out for you. The problem is.. is that we don't LIVE on a flat earth. That's why the globe model works so well, why the math for it is built into every GPS system in the world, as well as air autopilot systems, driverless car autopilot system, ship autopilot systems, handheld navigation devices, and every smart phone. And that we live on a round eaerth is why flat earthers cannot come up with a map that even has correct distances between points.
Can you really not see how this is true? That in thousands of years, with all of the modern info we have, with Auto Cad, advanced graphics, computer programs with advanced math and graphics, universities with advanced mathematical programs, etc. that NO ONE has been able to put the math into a computer to get a flat map that is correct? It literally should be fantastically easy. A kid in high school who is above average and questioning the round earth model should have already done it by now. No need for any photos from space. The globe earth map was not created with photos from space. It was created long before even FLIGHT was achieved... because thinking people are able to put such concepts together... but I know you just mentioned that because flat earthers seem to be unable to make a point without bringing up NASA. It's a fallback non-sequitur to which flat earthers base their entire belief system.
Think about that for a minute... or a LOT longer than a minute. With all of the info on the planet at our disposal. With all of the GPS coordinates and known points, with all of the distances between points known.. flat earthers can't put that info into a computer program to come up with a MAP!
There is absolutely no need for photos from space for you to create a map. Seriously. I honestly can't even believe that you think you'd need photos from space to create a map when you have 100% of the information needed to create one in a computer program.
Hell, most of you don't even BELIEVE SPACE EXISTS! So your demand that you need pictures from space before you can make a map makes your map impossible! How convenient for you!
But please share with me why you think you need a photo from space to create a map? What information would that provide you that NOT having such information has brought all flat earth mapmaking to an utter halt without? All the while... millions are using speroidal math in their GPS's to get around the planet perfectly.
You see a dude with a hand-drawn map on a SQUARE piece of paper, with a square Antarctica/ice wall, not done by auto-cad or any other program that anyone can actually check his distances, drawn without longitude and latitude, without a scale of measurements... and you accept it without any question! LOL.
Not to mention that there are virtually NO Flat earthers using this map, but instead using the Azimuthal projection map for their thought experiments.
If this is THE correct flat earth map, why isn't even the FLAT earth community accepting this? (Hint: it might be because it's a hand drawn map on a square piece of paper.)
Also, it CERTAINLY doesn't explain and is in direct contrast to:
MIrror image sundials in northern and southern hemispheres
24 hour days at all the far outside points of his map, all at the same time on their summer solstice, while the CENTER of the map is in darkness during that time
The circumnavigation of Antarctica
The sun setting due west everywhere on the planet on the spring equinox
Star trails in the northern hemisphere going different directions from star trails in ALL countries of the southern hemisphere, and also different at the equator
Why people in the outside edge of that map see all the same stars, spinning in the same direction, but in the CENTER of that map, they see different stars spinning in the opposite direction.
Mirror image equatorial mount telescopes for the different hemispheres
Why the moon appears one direction in the CENTER of that map, but upside down at far outer points of the map.
and I'd have to see his model of the sun and moon over it to see if it explains seasonality, how the sun sets minutes earlier at the bottom of tall buildings, moon phases, etc.
But SOOOO many things still wrong with his map. For instance, until it's on a computer program with correct distances and latitude and longitude, there's no way to tell if it can explain current sea and sailing routes, flight routes, etc.
But it's VERY weird that you accept a dude on YouTube's hand drawn map as THE OFFICIAL MAP OF FLAT EARTH without even being ABLE to check distances, longitude, latitude and such... but REJECT OUTRIGHT thousands of years of science on the topic, accurate globes with accurate distances that explain all of the above, that GPS uses spheroidal math and helps millions of people accurately navigate the earth properly every day, and thousands of other phenomenon that we see every day.
See why you guys have no credibility? You require THOUSANDS of times more evidence for round earth as you do for flat earth. We have a model that explains EVERYTHING that I mentioned perfectly... but without even being ABLE to test this model, you accept it UNCONDITIONALLY as FACT and correct, even though the model CANNOT explain the things that I mentioned just on it's face.
Can you see how irrational and illogical that is?
Yup, did you see the recent tests using state of the art equipment from South America? They confirmed that the pieces of land that they were testing were indeed flat, there was no question about it. I think the documentary was called convex earth the documentary. Worth a watch.
Congratulations @kerriknox! You have completed some achievement on Steemit and have been rewarded with new badge(s) :
Click on any badge to view your own Board of Honor on SteemitBoard.
For more information about SteemitBoard, click here
If you no longer want to receive notifications, reply to this comment with the word
STOPI love that flat earthers don't even have a flat earth map and just use globe-based maps.....and don't even know it.
probably because that is all we have to work with so far. Most flat earthers are aware that the maps are all projections of the globe.
What do you mean 'that's all we have to work with so far'? Flat earth belief has been around for thousands of years, and we know EVERY GPS spot on the planet and we know virtually EVERY distance between points, and those that we don't know, we can extrapoloate using SPHEROID MATH!
Without a correct model to work from, you cannot do correct thought experiments for ANY Of the other concepts that you are trying to 'prove'. It's a fourth grade science fair project fail to say that you KNOW your model is incorrect, but to do experiments from it anyway!
So, to say that you understand your maps are all globe projections, but to use them anyway, is really a huge failure on the part of flat earth thought. It says, "Yes, I know that we know all the points and distances on earth; yes, I know that we know all of the countries and their sizes. Yes, I know that we've had thousands of years to think about this. But we just aren't able to come up with a map other than a globe to work with. And we're still going to do flat earth thought experiments using a globe projection map anyway, despite the fact that NO thought experiment can be correct when the model we are using it incorrect. So, instead of focusing on making a correct map, which should be EASY since we have so much information about the world, we're going to repeat incorrect thought experiments over and over, and call you brainwashed if you don't accept them."
Do you see a problem with that?
No, probably not. Because you seem to have just admitted that you don't see a problem with that.
Who says people aren't working on a flat earth map/model that works? I don't see any problem with using something like the AE projection as a basic visual concept to help people understand the possibility of a different model.
Actually there is a map and another from different time periods oldest around 1000 years ago found in Buddhist temple recently, there you can clearly see the flat earth Antarctic surrounding it but also land outside of the wall, like how Admiral Byrd confirmed the US navy Admiral in the 50s.
Hi you just show prove that the mainstream flat earth model doesnt work. great job^^
now start questioning the globe too and think again
NASA Insider: We lied about everything!
I have questioned the globe. To conclude that I didn't, then post things that have ZERO TO DO WITH THE SHAPE OF THE EARTH is totally dishonest.
EVERYTHING the government says could be a lie... and we can STILL prove the earth is a globe with scientific inquiry... like they have been doing for a thousand years prior to NASA.
If you were 'doctor truth', you'd be able to separate out conspiracy theories from scientific inquiry. That you are unable or unwilling to do that means that you are either dishonest and only willing to confirm your own bias, or just unable to discern the difference in these two, entirely different issues.
Now, if i WERE using NASA as EVIDENCE of anything, then you could potentially prove my EVIDENCE is incorrect with the proper data, just like I did with YOUR evidence from the DogCam.
But that is not what you are doing. What you are doing is saying "the government lies.. therefore everything they say is a lie".
That is a non-sequitur, and is patently illogical. Stop being dishonest and illogical. I understand that you feel the need to confirm your bias, but take it somewhere else. I'm not interested in your logical fallacies and dishonesty.
Prove the globe if you can and stop wasting time with the fake FE Model
take care
The globe was proven a thousand years ago, and science continues to prove it over and over and over and over.
And again, DISPROVING one model and proving another are two entirely different things. You seem to think that if someone doesn't PROVE the globe model (to your satisfaction, of course, since it HAS been proven over and over), then the earth is flat.
It doesn't work that way. YOU need to ALSO prove YOUR model to make the claim that the earth is flat. But you will not do so. YOu simply DOUBT the globe model and ignore the dozens of impossibilities on a flat earth... like YOU even mentioned, 24 hour sunlight in Antarctica is simply impossible on ANY flat earth model.
You can BELIEVE that it's not on SOME fantasy model that has not been invented yet, but that is called faith, and not science. If you want to do faith, go to a church and talk about flat earth. I'm talking science here. And when it comes to science, EACH model has to be EQUALLY proven.
You saying over and over again that there is no curvature, when you can easily prove it yourself with a simple theodolite app, will never overcome the multiple impossibilities of a flat earth.
And since to make a declaration like "The Earth is Flat", well, you need to ACTUALLY prove your model and overcome the it's multiple impossibilities. But you can't overcome them. In fact, you don't even TRY, and your kind is STILL using a GLobe Projection Map because your model is so riciculous. So, why don't you just stop wasting time, period, and prove YOUR flat earth model?
YOu won't, because you can't.
https://steemit.com/flatearth/@kerriknox/the-flat-earth-map-is-actually-a-globe
You mean the fake NASA pictures even they have come out and said they are computer generated, there is no real picture of the earth, that's a fact. Every single one are computer generated. From NASA own words. Also look at old photographs of the earth then new ones the land magically triples in size, it's comical. And these are the photographs people like to swear by and say "look a globe" meanwhile even NASA have said these are computer generated and no real photos exist. Fools will be fools.
LOL. When you can't discuss the evidence at hand, be a good little cult follower and yell NASA LIES!!!!!! At every opportunity so you don't have to discuss NON nasa evidence that disproves your nonsense. I LITERALLY said absolutely nothing about NASA! Nothing!!! But your cult talking points require you to screech "NASA lies" like a maniacal cult parrot whenever you are proven wrong.
Flat earth cult rule #1: never EVER discuss the evidence at hand, just screech NASA LIES!!!!!! No matter what!
Let me guess: you are so stupid you think we've only known the earth is round since the fucking KENNEDY ADMINISTRATION??? Bwahahahaahaha. What a good little unthinking cult follower you are. A+++ for doing EXACTLY what the cult has told you to do and say!