well, if you are going to try to disprove of the FE then this disinformation isnt your best bet.
only the sleepiest of the sleepiest buy in to this article.
completely unable to compare both models and think for themselves.
your spoonfeading sheople a bunch of garbage,
0 flat earthers believe any map to be factual...
you are debunking claimes 0 flat earthers even believe.
instead of this gargbage, how about a repeatable experiment according to the scientiffic method, and proof we are living on a pearrock water ball shooting in a endless vaccuum of masonic lies..
that cant be confirmed with common sense and use of own senses.
nasa pictures unfortunately will not do as they admit they are ALL cgi photoshop cartoons...
the moonlandings are faked and if people cant see that earth pictures are faked aswell.. then i pity them
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
You have not debunked a single piece of evidence I presented in my entire article.
This is defined as ad hominem, a logical fallacy go look it up.
No, the model shown the azimuthal equidistant projection map is the most agreed to model for the "flat Earth hypothesis", and you have to present a model for your argument. Furthermore, I don't care what flat Earth model you come up with these flight times are impossible on any flat Earth map. I am also debunking the flat Earth model, so therefore I am debunking exactly what flat Earther's wrongfully believe.
You cannot debunk any of the evidence I have presented here, so you change the goal post and dodge the evidence already presented. You can repeat these observations using other flight times, and you can go take the Antarctica flight tour and travel directly over the South Pole yourself as pointed out in the article thus allowing anyone to see the world is spherical. NASA and Freemasons have nothing to do with it, the Earth is spherical due to the FACT that based on scientific observation you can prove it.
The photoshops are replicas of a real one taken from a distance we don't travel out to anymore. And of course you're going to say the "original" is a fake too, but you've still gotten the facts about what NASA "admits" completely wrong, and are either telling blatant fibs or not bothering to do the most basic research, so who should ever trust you to talk about "disinformation"?
"completely unable to compare both models and think for themselves"
You have a model to compare with the globe model? I've been asking flat earther for this model for a very long time and none will provide one for me to compare the models. Since you JUST CLAIMED to have a model, can you please prove this claim and provide it?
PS. It literally takes zero effort to debunk the flat earth. It is impossible in dozens and dozens of provable ways. Your ONLY weapon is incredulity. The rest is lies, denying reality, and an inability to do math.