You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: The Flat Earth “Psyop”… ?

in #flatearth7 years ago

Hi Sean.
I finally opened a steemit account, on account of you.
I don't have any f-book, twitter, utube/guugle, etc. etc. accounts.
You're "a good kid" Sean.
Let me with my 'worldly experience' try to help with what I know.
I'm a collector of old maps & terrestrial globes.
I have a few atlases, the oldest from the 1700's.
My oldest maps are from 1500's.
Yes, maps done by Mercator, Ortelius, Münster etc.
I've done alot of research concerning our Earth thru a historical perspective, hands-on.
The Earth is ROUND; a globe.
Ever hear of Ptolemy's Cosmographia ?
Sean, I haven't lived in the States for almost 40 years now.
I ain't 'brainwashed', exposed to the msm- 'programming' you folks are bombarded with 24/7.
I most definitely believe flat-earth is a psy-op.
I truly appreciate the open-mindedness you have regarding The Phaser.
It's always important to try new approaches.
With regards to the 'theoretical physics', WE humans are perhaps approaching the kindergarden-level in actual achievement; the 'secret space program' places us at best as 2-graders.
Continue with your Excellent Work!
Thanks Sean.
X-

Sort:  

Tanks x. For the record folks, I am not a "flat earther" nor and I stupid person. I am however, intellectually curious AND I know that the ruling elite have been LYING to us about the nature of everything, including the theoretical "Big Bang", since the beginning of time. I simply find quotes like this one thought provoking:

Engineer, W. Winckler, wrote into the Earth Review October 1893 regarding the Earth’s supposed curvature, stating, “As an engineer of many years standing, I saw that this absurd allowance is only permitted in school books. No engineer would dream of allowing anything of the kind. I have projected many miles of railways and many more of canals and the allowance has not even been thought of, much less allowed for. This allowance for curvature means this - that it is 8” for the first mile of a canal, and increasing at the ratio by the square of the distance in miles; thus a small navigable canal for boats, say 30 miles long, will have, by the above rule an allowance for curvature of 600 feet. Think of that and then please credit engineers as not being quite such fools. Nothing of the sort is allowed. We no more think of allowing 600 feet for a line of 30 miles of railway or canal, than of wasting our time trying to square the circle”