I say it is a good scheme. I think a validation process will be needed to prevent individuals with alts tarnishing the credibility of the votes/decision making in inter-circle activities.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
I say it is a good scheme. I think a validation process will be needed to prevent individuals with alts tarnishing the credibility of the votes/decision making in inter-circle activities.
Thanks for your comment. We thought this rule would be enough to deal with this kind of problem:
Did we miss something? Should the rule be bettered in some way?