That sounds like very bad news for everyone who had their accounts plundered on Steemit.
So by your reasoning what occurred was not theft?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
That sounds like very bad news for everyone who had their accounts plundered on Steemit.
So by your reasoning what occurred was not theft?
You grossly misinterpreted my point.
To clarify, Hive was a chain split, an airdrop, and a taxable event. It could not be stolen from those excluded because they never owned any.
Ownership of Hive prior to the split cannot be demonstrated because Hive didn't exist.
Steem HF23 was not a chain split, was not airdropped, and was not a taxable event. The siezed steem was stolen because it was owned. Ownership of Steem prior to HF23 is very easy to demonstrate.