I've started flagging those sorts of comments. It's easy to check if they are a repeat offender. I only use a few percent, but that will cancel out what they can earn from a self-vote.
The post about efficient self-voting was pointing out some flaws in Steemit with how delegating SP works. I think it was a valid post.
Is there any chance you can link me that post if you remember who did it? I clearly acted hastily, if it was a satirical thing, so I'd like to remove my flag.
I thought it was just a cunt teaching others cunts how to be more cuntish.
It was this one https://steemit.com/steemit/@twinner/howto-vote-every-post-or-comment-twice-a-tutorial-for-the-advanced-selfvoter-increase-your-income-by-50-now
Nah, that's not it. The post I flagged was titled something akin to,
"How to get 50% extra out of your voting power. An intensive guide for the avid self-voter"
Or something like that.. But, you still have me wondering if that was satire. Didn't look like it, but I'm going to run through my history on SDB and see if I wrongfully flagged someone.
This one did say 50% originally. Looks like he re-calculated
It is still not the same one. Different image and there is no flag for me to remove.
So, this means there are multiple posts about how to self vote efficiently out there at this moment. Lol. I suppose what I said in the post was more relevant than I even knew at the time.
Interesting. I do try to read enough of a post to tell if it's encouraging bad behaviour. I also check for comments by Cheetah to indicate plagiarism.