I don't see it as voting for or approving of a president. I believe you agree, a vote can never give someone authority to act in aggression. So even if you somehow were mind-controlled and did a 180, I would not feel personal shame (only concern for you). It is about participating in a poll let the country know how many people believe certain things. I don't believe the traditional vote is creditable either, but I don't see any down side as long as I don't put my faith into that.
Voting is powerful and we do it everyday now on a blockchain. I'm thinking this will probably need to take place on a blockchain anyways or it will never work in the traditional system (you may prove me wrong). Lets do both just in-case .. I'm really happy your using the existing platform, it is a way to have a voice. The blockchain votes can run alongside an election and provide an audit tool. This is a really good opportunity to start the audits!
And yet the platform Adam is running on will prohibit free market price calculation to determine accurate supply and demand for distribution of resources, free, non-permission-necessary homesteading of unowned lands, etc.
Regardless, a non-voluntarily consented to election does not give anyone authority to act in aggression, or even to do what they deem to be "good" things. Majority votes simply cannot grant legitimate authority over non-consenting human beings.
I don't see it as voting for or approving of a president. I believe you agree, a vote can never give someone authority to act in aggression. So even if you somehow were mind-controlled and did a 180, I would not feel personal shame (only concern for you). It is about participating in a poll let the country know how many people believe certain things. I don't believe the traditional vote is creditable either, but I don't see any down side as long as I don't put my faith into that.
Voting is powerful and we do it everyday now on a blockchain. I'm thinking this will probably need to take place on a blockchain anyways or it will never work in the traditional system (you may prove me wrong). Lets do both just in-case .. I'm really happy your using the existing platform, it is a way to have a voice. The blockchain votes can run alongside an election and provide an audit tool. This is a really good opportunity to start the audits!
And yet the platform Adam is running on will prohibit free market price calculation to determine accurate supply and demand for distribution of resources, free, non-permission-necessary homesteading of unowned lands, etc.
Regardless, a non-voluntarily consented to election does not give anyone authority to act in aggression, or even to do what they deem to be "good" things. Majority votes simply cannot grant legitimate authority over non-consenting human beings.