I love this idea and I just watched the "Debate" between you and Larken Rose so I like this idea even more. I agree with Jeff Berwick, we have got to attack this from every angle we can and I am not sure what angle Larken is using? I guess no angle, just stay negative and say no way. I wish Larken would work with you, he doesn't have to agree or even vote but at least see that you are doing something and you have and will continue to wake people up and realistically winning this first round in 2020 is a long shot, but at least you are taking a shot and who knows we still have some time before 2020 and the people have had about enough of the 2 party system and you will be allowed to debate with the other candidates so stay positive there is a chance. The LP will make that decision in 2020 if they want you to represent the party. Also, I want to say THANK YOU! I got my second box of FREEDOM books yesterday and I will passing them out. #Freedom4All
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Thank you so much for watching the debate and support the idea! I really appreciate it brother. I wish he would work with me as well, maybe time will change his mind! And oh awesome, glad it came in!
You are a true friend one day he will work with you, because time will continue to run and it will change his mindset. I really like the idea of your friends, you are the world's pearls.
Larken understands that assuming centralized control and authority over lands, people, and resources via the American electoral process is morally illegitimate.
It’s not about a “better plan.” There are lots of “plans” already taking place that are decentralized and which do not assume authority over other human beings via majority vote.
Many say Adam’s plan assumes no authority over others, or won’t require force against non-violent individuals.
What happens when someone wishes to homestead part of a National Park Kokesh personally assigns to a specific non-profit (read his platform)? He claims the parks will be kept “open to the public.” Can the homesteader ignore this and freely homestead anyway as libertarianism dictates he can? Or does he have to get approval from Kokesh or the non-profit, meaning his individual self-ownership (freedom to move, homestead, etc) is being violated.
What of all the other departments, resources, etc. Accurate price calculation and fair “distribution” is only ever achieved by the free market. Economics is a science that has already established that centralized planning cannot accurately calculate prices, and ends up harming individuals far-removed from the law maker’s dictates. Local communities and property owners from the bottom up (the market) decide via their individual market actions. This simply does not work from the top down.
This campaign is, if unintentionally, designed to fail.
Does majority vote grant authority?
No.
By the way, watching the debate now. Not 10 mins in and Kokesh making passive aggression suggestions Larken might be Cointelpro. Dude sounds just like a politician.
You are on the wrong thread. This is about a book drop.
I’m not replying to you, and no, I’m not on the wrong thread. Only nested one deep. Read the comment above mine (the original comment I am replying to).
Every action has consequences. You are both friends of mine. Our actions, no matter how minor they seem to be, have powerful consequences. The objective is what's important. Focusing on it makes one consistent. You, anyone, will be seen as inconsistent, if they do not focus on and further that objective with every single action taken. We may be confused by specific and small actions, but the overall path is clear. Those of us on the same path are friends. We are not merely allies, allies as defined as enemies of our enemy, but we are instead friends who seek to further the same greater cause. My cause is individual liberty. Is that not your cause cause? Is it not Larken's? Is it not Kokesh's?!
/agree The entire system is rigged of course. What's important is fighting it in any way possible and doing everything we can to further the message of individual liberty. Anyone doing that is worthy of our support as friends, and my definition of a friend is someone furthering individual liberty at any cost!