That's why Levin is dead wrong on his interventionist view: whether you know of a plan by Japan to attack Pearl Harbor or not, you cannot say for sure it will happen until it does. If it does, there should be a retaliation, but not before. If you apply Levin's thought process to the Cuban Missile Crisis, it would result in our first strike of a nuclear war. This type of dangerous thinking by Levin should be medically treated.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Levin is FAR from being a collectivist, he is a Constitutionalist. I doo not always agree with him, but first strike has been part of our miitary's plans for decades. Pearl Harbor is no nuke, so a bad comparison. What do you think will happen if the enemy sets of an EMP? Any unprotected electronics will be fried, takes out the power grid, vehicles newer vehicles, military vehicles and planes will be dead. So, you just wait around for it to happen