Are the alt-righters Social Justice Warriors?
As social justice we understand the notion that some groups need to be compensated for the injustice they experienced in the past which made them underprivileged.
But in practice, what social justice really is, is welfare for the incompetent.
It is a redistribution of goods from the productive to the unproductive under a cool sounding slogan.
It is a perpetuation of weakness on the backs of the strong.
It is the eternal parasitism of the eternally underprivileged on those who are industrious enough to provide.
It is basically barefoot leftism.
So are the alt-righters in fact social justice warriors for the whites?
Yes, they are.
Let's start with the easiest part.
Protectionism vs free trade.
There is no single economist, either on the left or on the right, no single serious economist who would propose protectionist measures. The science is settled on the matters of trade. Free trade benefits everyone, it is a win-win situation for every side engaged in it. Consumers get cheap goods from abroad, so they don't spend too much on stuff, so they have more money to spend on other stuff, like education of their children, or investing in stocks, or eating out, or attending opera. Local economy booms from free trade. Yes, some people lose their jobs.
Guess what. They lose their jobs because they are objectively not productive enough to provide their fellow men, the consumers, goods at a competetive price. Either their wages are too high compared to the world market price for their jobs, or the effectiveness or quality of their products is too low for the consumers to consider buying them.
Either way, protectionism, that is, protecting those jobs from foreign competition, amounts to welfare for the ineffective workers. Social justice for the unnecessary jobs. Prolonging the inevitable, on the backs of the consumers. Because under protectionism, with protective tariffs increasing the prices of imported goods, consumers must pay more. They become objectively poorer because of that. Now the jobs of some workers are protected, but others become unemployed because consumers now cannot afford either eating out, or afford additional courses for children, or going to theatre, or buying books, etc. The sum of wealth decreases because of protectionism.
This is exactly the same if, in absence of protective tariffs, workers went on welfare - this time the cost would be borne by taxpayers. But consumers are taxpayers too, they are the same people.
So there is really no sense in protecting obsolete jobs which offer no value added. The effect would be the same if workers went on welfare.
But alt-right demands social justice for workers, job protection. As if working in an obsolete factory and doing ineffective stuff was some kind of ennoblement. It is not. It is tiresome, gruelling and unfulfilling. A worker does not have a right to a job. He only has a right to be free to pursue his happiness, by finding a new job, if the old one becomes obsolete. Jobs are not the end, they are a means to an end, which is consumption, which is living a happy life.
There should be no social justice for workers, you hear me, Vox Day?
Immigration
Other part of this idiotic alt-right social justice crap is the resistance to any kind of immigration. Why? Because immigrants steal jobs. Yeah, white people are so dumb and lazy that a Mexican can steal a white man's job. Yeah, right, in hedge fund managing?
Well then, a Chinaman will steal that job!
So build a wall and let us grow lazy, entitled and arrogant.
Who bears the costs? Consumers, at first. With no influx of lower cost, higher efficiency workers, the real wages stagnate and decrease. Costs of living grow, because without competition for jobs, there is no innovation. But in the end, robots take your jobs, buddy. Because it finally becomes more profitable to automate everything than to keep a lazy, shiftless white bum who refused to educate and improve himself on the job anyway.
Immigration and greater competition for jobs would save you from that.
But no, you preferred social justice for workers and keep immigrants out.
I'm talking only about high IQ immigrants here, legal, vetted migrants who want to work in a capitalist economy, improving theirs as well as your lives.
You reject it - you lose. In the end robots take over and you have to eek out a poor living out of the trashcan.
As you can clearly see, alt-right hates competition - while competition is the part and parcel of real life in the real world.
Alt-right would want to protect white people from every danger in this world, secure their jobs and short-term interest. But the costs it would impose on everyone would exceed the expected benefits, and in the end everyone would be poorer, economy would be worse, and the imagined ethnostate would be as weak and pathetic as communist Poland was at the end of her obnoxious existence.
Alt-right is no different from leftists. Alt-right is basically Bernie Sanders for white people.
And Bernie Sanders equals Venezuela.
Alt-right is Venezuela for white people.
Alt-right equals destruction of white people.
Alt-right are RACE TRAITORS.
START UP THE ROTORS
Most importantly, they are just retards.
Yea, that's very mature and responsible to suggest killing people of other worldviews and views on politics ;)
Nazis don't have rights.
They do, as every human being. At last the right for a fair law court.
Paradoxically "they dont have rights, they are not people" or something like that is what actual, real nazis would say about other people, dehumanizing them. It is dangerous to think that we are the ones that can define who is "nazi/subhuman" that do not have rights.
National socialists are more valuable human beings than libertarians, libertarians of Ukraine are escaping from military service. On the other hand Ukrainian national socialists were the first voluntary power capable of halting separatist advance on Mariupol back in 2014.
everyone should escape from military service. there is no glory in dying in a dirt
Then barbarians would conquer western world, barbarians without remorse like Russia, Turkey or even worse - Terrorist Jihadists.
Military service should be compulsory in the times of war, in times of peace - young men should be taught how to operate with light and heavy weaponry.
Russia did not conquer Europe because of compulsory military service, but because of NATO and USA which has voluntary military, the greatest in the world. Military might is not created with cannon fodder - but with free minds.
Weird implication you made there. I could agree that military might is not created with compulsory nor voluntary military service, it's more like innovation, technological progress and capitalism are necessary in order to increase advancement of army. But you need soldiers in the time of war, you need a lot of them. Someone must operate advanced weaponry on the battlefront.
Btw, US had compulsory conscription under war circumstances before WW2 and for a long time after. Without compulsory conscription there would be problems with defeating Third Reich, because no Soviet Union, nor Allied Powers wouldn't be capable of forcing them out without enough men power.
Compulsory military service in the times of war is normal in every capitalist country, not even mentioning collectivist states like China where it's normal everyday, or half collectivist state like Israel.