What exactly do you suggest we do instead of flagging plagiarism, spam, phishing links etc?
Do you have a solution that is available? Do you understand there are people that have lost their livelihood because of these phishing accounts and you would rather strive against us rather than help us shut them down?
Is that what I am understanding that because of your black and white perception of what is censorship vs what is moderation that you would prefer abusers degrade the value of this platform?
My solution is - to do nothing. It can sound bad, but it's the better solution. Every time when more secure solution is chosen, the freedom suffer from it. Plagiarism will exist - one way or another. As a bloger - any user of the Steem platform should accept this fact. By enabling flagging/banning post/comments we accept the future possibility of limiting the freedom of speech, because bots can "ban" not only those "bad" posts and comments but also those good - by random or according to the will of their creators.
What exactly do you suggest we do instead of flagging plagiarism, spam, phishing links etc?
Do you have a solution that is available? Do you understand there are people that have lost their livelihood because of these phishing accounts and you would rather strive against us rather than help us shut them down?
Is that what I am understanding that because of your black and white perception of what is censorship vs what is moderation that you would prefer abusers degrade the value of this platform?
My solution is - to do nothing. It can sound bad, but it's the better solution. Every time when more secure solution is chosen, the freedom suffer from it. Plagiarism will exist - one way or another. As a bloger - any user of the Steem platform should accept this fact. By enabling flagging/banning post/comments we accept the future possibility of limiting the freedom of speech, because bots can "ban" not only those "bad" posts and comments but also those good - by random or according to the will of their creators.