Agreed, not good either way. Sean just being an echo chamber could certainly be the case as well, but it sadly doesn't bode well either with him being a supposed "truth telling" news source.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Agreed, not good either way. Sean just being an echo chamber could certainly be the case as well, but it sadly doesn't bode well either with him being a supposed "truth telling" news source.
Daniel Liszt aka Dark Journalist summed up his thoughts a few days ago concerning "Q":
At 2:29:24
Anyone who has the IQ & posses an Intellectual Reasoning capacity sees immediately it's an psy-op.
I've come to the conclusion that Sean-SGT isn't as smart as we would like for him to be & his Christian compassion + indoctrination is responsible for his distorted view of reality.
Regardless, I don't appreciate at all his demeaning statements in his last interview.
Ridicule is NOT a virtue.
Good-Call herrleeb & N&V.
X-
So far I've given Sean the benefit of the doubt, however the longer and more intense this Trump / Q theater goes on with him, the more I start to doubt it's just a question of him being "not too bright". There's a point where you need to question why he's not digging any deeper than the "white hat / black hat" narrative. And this is not just with Trump, it's also with other "good guy / bad guy" narratives like those from Bix Weir as well as the "everything about crypto is good" narrative from Clif High.
The problem with all these regular stories that Sean is carrying is that they encourage people to follow very simple alternative media narratives with no real deeper analysis or thinking. At a certain point, Sean starts to look more like a limited hangout gatekeeper rather than a serious truth researcher and truth teller. I don't want to believe this is true, but over time, facts eventually start to speak for themselves. Let's see how Sean's videos further develop with the latest "Q implosion" with Corsi and see if Sean just keeps playing along as usual or not..
In my opinion it does not even matter if someone is a gatekeeper or just stupid. The result is pretty much the same. My strategy is to simply stay away from these people. I've made the experience that it is nearly impossible nowadays to change anyone's mind or opinion. We truly live in a post-fact society. Q-Anon or Flat-earth folks are pretty much the same kind. It's not a good idea to start a discussion, there is no end to it and mostly it ends badly. So I usually comment only on posts I essentially agree with and stay away from stuff that is too dumb or obvious disinformation. Unfortunately there are only very few out there I really agree with. We seem to be an absolute minority. Generations of fluoridation and indoctrination take it's toll. As someone said "You can't cure stupid" :)
I certainly agree that you can't cure stupid, but sometimes you can help people realize that they need to think differently and deeper (if it's not just a stupidity problem.) Not sure if that's possible here, but if it is, then sometimes it's worth trying to make a difference. The question is then when to just give up trying..
That's right. We can't stop trying, we owe it to ourselves, even if the chances are dismal. And actually I've also made the experience that some guys I thought to be shills at first turned out to be OK. Some are just ignorant of certain facts and come to the wrong conclusions but later learn and change their perspective.
Keep up the great work, you are one of the few...
Thank you. You as well. Keep up the good fight..