I get you. Thank you.
I hope to present my observations which I see as overwhelming evidences of highly classified geo-engineering operations. I don't have any first hand evidence for aluminium. Aluminium isn't part of my evidences.
I'm eager to see to what conclusions people will come up with and see if they, like a lot of us, come to the conclusion this scientists collection of peer-reviewed papers seems suspiciously off from what is being observed for whatever reasons, be it that they've been coherced to conclude what they concluded, incentivized to lie or simply made bad observation, thus bad science.
I'll eventually read the paper this week. I'll most probably comment on it when I'll publish my article on the subject. This would make a lot of sense.