Is it so bad for @futuremind to get a small percentage to add to his steem power? Also the market fluctuations between doge and steem have fluctuated quite a bit during my Giveaways, and also the post payouts go up and down. Always around the same amount, and usually with enough room to ensure I don't encumber a loss. Now consider the fact that I'm working full time on blogs, running a chat server, and keeping communication with my followers. I do all this on a tablet as well, which slows my productivity. I simply leave myself enough room to not have to worry about fluctuations and days where the upvotes are small.
This seems like a morally driven question. Am I wrong? Perhaps my perception is off.
Since your so curious about my business model in regards to my Doge giveaway (that I could easily supplement with a blog that will pay 100 percent to me, and potentially make me much more with a time allotment comparable to this) my plan is to increase the giveaway to 350 when I reach an "average" payout of 2 dollars. This of course will be contingent to the current rates.
I'm a little surprised that a crypto economist wouldn't have conceptualized all this without a thorough breakdown from myself. I enjoy giving away free crypto. I've never had a single person question my model here, but there is a first time for everything. And I hope this satisfies your question.
Now I understand. that explanation clarifies everything
Um I'm confused bro, because you didn't ask the question. Are you also crypto economist?