awesome comment and i like the idea of 'outbuilding'. I see it being a competition, but lets remember the government represents us, or should.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
awesome comment and i like the idea of 'outbuilding'. I see it being a competition, but lets remember the government represents us, or should.
Thanks. Unfortunately, it doesn't at this time. And ultimately (although it's not that I consider minarchism deeply immoral "if done right") I would like to replace the state entirely.
"Government" in such a case would rely on volountary interactions and agreements, not on any kind of state having a monopoly on governance. It's a radical idea and it might seem scary but it's possible and, since it would beneficial for us to have more and more peacefull competition in "governance", it should --- of course, very carefully and intelligently --- be planned out and fully executed.
Until that last day -- that last piece -- though, we need to focus more on the basics of the infrastructure. If we are to get the empoverished on our side, then can we really win just by arguing that "it's immoral" that they support the very system that clothes and feeds them? I'm an optimistic person... but I don't think so.
And there is still going to be some unemloyment and some crisises arising from time to time, even after the state is gone. We are going to need an organisation to deal with that. (not a state, but any kind of systematic yet volountary approach)
Those truly aware of reality know that problems will arise no matter the system.