Hey @jedigeiss Hmmm... I'm still learning and thought I'd give it a bash to see what the difference is between solo and pool mining. I read somewhere that GRCpool 2 (which I'm in) takes 20% of the rewards.
I was running LHC, SETI and NFS but they seemed to be out of work and then added Cosmology and Asteroids yesterday. I found SETI liked my GPU so far, while NFS and LHC were also giving me good returns on the CPU's. What projects would you recommend?
This is incorrect. GRC pool actually takes 0% of your earnings, and you pay a very small fee when you withdraw anything. The pool has entirely open financials, so you can see exactly what the pool is earning. It is phenomenally little.
I am misinformed then. Thanks @dutch for clearing that up
Yeah iam mining with the tool for quite a time ( you can even see me in the magnitude report) and I never had the feeling I get robbed ;)
Quite the contrary whoever maintains that pool is doing the hell of a job, a lot of features have already been added while iam there. Keep up the good work !
No worries at all! =)
There is a lot of misinformation floating around.
well actually this depends on what you really got under the hood.
There are some rules that apply while selecting a project (grcpool has an own page for that somewhere)
you can see a lot of this information and even a lot more on Gridcoinstats
what you also can see on this page is the max RAC for different kinds of CPUS, this is on the site for each project, so you can determine what your CPU may be up to in the end.
what i also use as an info is the whitelisted projects where you can see all the projects with all the possible crunchers and you can identify easily which ones NOT to do with a CPU :)
I will definitely check this out. I read Amicable Numbers is a good one to assign a GPU to but for some reason I'm not getting any jobs from them... Thanks for the tips!