You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: Brainstorming Gridcoinstats Ideas Thread [25 SBD in Bounty]

in #gridcoinstats7 years ago (edited)

I like gridcoinstats already a lot as well; very informative! But since you wanted some new ideas, I'd suggest to improve the graphs/stats (they are already well made):

  • Interactive graphs; like the ones at boincstats.com [link];
    I often check out the 4th graph to understand how our Team RAC developed over time
    • alternatively: a table of the plotted values
  • Provide a tick box for all graphs that allows to set baselines to 0 (especially Team RAC)
  • A graph that compares the individual Team RACs of all white-listed projects together over time (possibly with a logarithmic y-axis)

What I also miss, but Brain from grcpool implemented already nicely [link]:
... a list that allows to filter interactively white-(& gray)-listed projects by the provided application types (Windows, Linux, GPUs, Android, etc.)

Sort:  

A graph that compares the individual Team RACs of all white-listed projects together over time (possibly with a logarithmic y-axis)

The difficulty with this one is that projects hand our RAC at hugely varying rates. I have seen a ten fold difference between projects when switching from Moo Wrapper to SETI.

I know, dutch. Currently, the Team RAC even varies by a factor of ~200 and it can vary even more if a new project got white-listed. For this reason I suggested a logarithmic y-axis. I don't know how this would look like with 25+ lines, but it's the only way to compare the temporal evolution of all projects together in one place.

Team RAC even varies by a factor of ~200

I did not even consider that before, but I assume you are meaning between a CPU and a GPU project, correct? Maybe (if that is even feasible) we could get two graphs to compare RAC between projects - one for CPU and one for GPU, with the RAC in each scaled to some baseline.

  • Interactive graphs: In plans. Good suggestion though! Regarding RAC, @dutch has a point. But I could make the graphs so you can see differences in changes per project. Visualizing each project with a line instead of combining them. Combining them wouldn't do much good.
  • Interactive projects list: Nice. Added to the plans for sure. Been working on adding more details about projects, but not the way it was presented.

+1 more visual stats with interaction