Does Halo platform exhibit counterparty risk heretofore unknown in crypto? For as I understand it, as it stands now in order for Masternode operators to get their collateral back, they are required to go bother Scott in the discord room and have him manually terminate the contract. Hardly optimal, scalable, or decentralized, wouldn't you agree? Halo platform is the only known masternode network where the collateral is inaccessible by the owner, this seems like an extreme counterparty risk.
Is there an update (or cli command) that will fix this issue?
Masternode owners can sell all or part of their masternode assets within our client. This is the most optimal and decentralized means of "terminating" a contract.
Thanks for your reply! However, if in order to have one's collateral returned, one must wait for it to "sell" - please explain how that is "optimal" as it sure seems far from it.
Every other MN allows you immediate access to the collateral when you stop the node. The fact that Halo apparently does not, seems like a serious bottleneck issue (if I'm understanding it correctly), in that MN owners' collateral is locked up.
What about a MN owner who stops their node - how do they access their collateral? perhaps i'm missing that detail, but i've looked at all the docs i could find and have yet to figure that out...