I want to thank everyone who reads this and I encourage you to watch the video at the top, at least, because it has content in there that isn't in the text.
Edit: I did some further looking into this and see that you are original author.
Sorry, but you can understand that I was trying to protect authors like yourself from being plagiarized.
As you can see, Cheetah left you a comment. That is a bot that looks for similar information elsewhere on the web and leaves a comment as a warning to others of possible plagiarism. You may lose votes if people suspect that it is not your own work.
Please make some sort of comment in the post that this is an older piece of your own work.
Normally, whenever we quote something found elsewhere on the web, or out of a book, we indicate that it is not our words by putting the > symbol in front of the quoted material. That way Cheetah will ignore it.
For example: >When we have .... (looks like below)
When we have this much proof for cures of various diseases, from both doctors and countless patients from around the world, it's hard to disregard it all as being pseudoscience with no basis for legitimacy.
Original Comment: This is totally cut and paste from another article.
None of these words are your own.
You did not even give credit to the real author.
You will get in trouble REAL quickly here on Steemit doing stuff like this.
The flags will start coming and your reputation # will tank quickly.
I'm a little confused about all this. Is there a post showing all the etiquette that needs to be known here on Steemit? I wouldn't have ever thought to add a >. Not that I needed to. Everything is my writing. The intro in the beginning of the video clearly show The Awareness Revolution. The main focus is that video. Everythign else below it is just supporting what I stated in the video.
So if I state in my posts that it's from an older post of mine, then the bots will take notice? The bot that commented upvoted, which is odd if you're suggesting that it was really giving me a plagarism warning. Also, the link's URL clearly has The Awareness Revolution in it. So you saw the bot say that but didn't notice the link is to my own website?
if there's anythign else I should know to avoid things like this in the future please let me know.
It is a big learning process, yes.
There are many of posts made by community members about the rules; and the biggest one is no plagiarism. Second would be no spamming.
Steemit is meant to be original content.
It is more than fine to link to someone else's video or content, but the person must put their own thoughts about it.
I want to help you get noticed. I like what you write. I had wanted to vote, but then doubted whether you were the original author when I saw the Cheetah comment. Cheetah isn't saying that it is plagiarism, but is just one way for people to be more careful. Nobody wants to vote on plagiarized stuff, especially those people who have lots of voting power and could give you the most rewards.
You should probably add your Youtube channel in your profile as well, along with a description of what you are all about. Also mention on your youtube channel and website that you are on Steemit too. That way it's easier to know you are who you claim.
Anyways, you are allowed to post your own already-published articles over here on Steemit.
But it would be best to add a note to the top of bottom about how this is your original content, that has already been posted elsewhere on the web. Just make it quick and easy for people to tell so that they don't have to guess.
Ouch pretty harsh!! I'm SO glad you did the research to find out that @arevolution is legit. 😊 Thanks for looking out though!
What a great compliment that it was so good it looked copied! ❤
I did finish watching the video just now. Very interesting information. Lots of new names I've never heard before..and to know the FDA gets to control our speech on the issue?? That's nauseating.
Yes it is. But I'd imagine if enough of us knew what they're up to we could change things. Hence, the reason I post about it. Thanks for watching the video. Bookmark it or something in case you ever need to explain to someone why these cures aren't allowed to surface.
Big Pharma doesn't need cured people, it needs patients.
Also, talking to my American friends I've come to the conclusion that it is just an illusion the US spends so much money on healthcare. It seems to me medical services are simply over-priced to create this illusion (and make some people very rich). Someone told me that for a one-day stay in the hospital the bill amounted to $27.000! For a nasty flu!
Yep. It's a scam. A big part of the reason why it's able to perpetuate is due to the fact that we're so disconnected from paying it. Most people don't pay out of pocket. They pay with insurance, medicare, or medicaid, and could care less what the hospital charges. This is yet another example of the government appearing to be trying to help but unintended consequences come along with it. If it were on a free market, that wouldn't happen. Big government is not the answer. It's the problem.
This is true. I have called the hospital and inquired about medical service prices, and also about billing. The first question the financial administrator always asks is: "Insurance, or cash price?" Seems they have a menu of services priced differently depending upon whether or not you pay in cash, out of pocket.
And I have a bill here somewhere that shows 1 single night's stay in "observation" in the E.R.
That bill is over $17,000 USD.
And they literally did nothing except watch me.
I noticed a possible inconsistency in your post, and I was wondering if you could clarify it for me. You write:
Normally, new additions to the food supply should be tested for safety before allowed to enter the marketplace. Since Michael Taylor just happened to be running the FDA at that time, he let it pass without requiring the typical testing.
However, you also berate the FDA for taking too long to approve certain drugs. Couldn't you argue that they are just being overly cautious?
Also, how is the FDA keeping other countries from doing research on drugs?
Hey, thanks for your comment. Good questions too. To be honest, I wrote this years ago. Where did I say the FDA takes too long to approve drugs? I skimmed it a few times and didn't see it. Maybe in the video? I"m not sure sorry.
I don't know as much about how other countries operate. But the FDA only has jurisdiction here in the US. However, the pharmaceutical companies are worldwide. Other countries do allow some natural things to be used as treatment for diseases. In that way some countries are more advanced than us. So if you're out of the country you can say "xyz herb" can be used to treat cancer (if in fact it is used for that there) but it's illegal to say the same thing here, in the land of the free.
For example, a lot of the medicinal mushrooms are used in conjunction with chemo and radiation in some other countries. It mitigates a lot of the harmful effects and even makes the treatment work better. But we don't do that here. So doctors can't do it, recommend it, and that's even if they know about it, which most don't. They only know what they're taught in school and are required by law to follow procedure or risk getting their license taken away.
I want to thank everyone who reads this and I encourage you to watch the video at the top, at least, because it has content in there that isn't in the text.
Edit: I did some further looking into this and see that you are original author.
Sorry, but you can understand that I was trying to protect authors like yourself from being plagiarized.
As you can see, Cheetah left you a comment. That is a bot that looks for similar information elsewhere on the web and leaves a comment as a warning to others of possible plagiarism. You may lose votes if people suspect that it is not your own work.
Please make some sort of comment in the post that this is an older piece of your own work.
Normally, whenever we quote something found elsewhere on the web, or out of a book, we indicate that it is not our words by putting the > symbol in front of the quoted material. That way Cheetah will ignore it.
For example: >When we have .... (looks like below)
Original Comment: This is totally cut and paste from another article.
None of these words are your own.
You did not even give credit to the real author.
You will get in trouble REAL quickly here on Steemit doing stuff like this.
The flags will start coming and your reputation # will tank quickly.
I'm a little confused about all this. Is there a post showing all the etiquette that needs to be known here on Steemit? I wouldn't have ever thought to add a >. Not that I needed to. Everything is my writing. The intro in the beginning of the video clearly show The Awareness Revolution. The main focus is that video. Everythign else below it is just supporting what I stated in the video.
So if I state in my posts that it's from an older post of mine, then the bots will take notice? The bot that commented upvoted, which is odd if you're suggesting that it was really giving me a plagarism warning. Also, the link's URL clearly has The Awareness Revolution in it. So you saw the bot say that but didn't notice the link is to my own website?
if there's anythign else I should know to avoid things like this in the future please let me know.
It is a big learning process, yes.
There are many of posts made by community members about the rules; and the biggest one is no plagiarism. Second would be no spamming.
Steemit is meant to be original content.
It is more than fine to link to someone else's video or content, but the person must put their own thoughts about it.
Here is a good video to watch for a start:
https://steemit.com/minnowsupportproject/@minnowsupport/community-posting-guidelines
I want to help you get noticed. I like what you write. I had wanted to vote, but then doubted whether you were the original author when I saw the Cheetah comment. Cheetah isn't saying that it is plagiarism, but is just one way for people to be more careful. Nobody wants to vote on plagiarized stuff, especially those people who have lots of voting power and could give you the most rewards.
You should probably add your Youtube channel in your profile as well, along with a description of what you are all about. Also mention on your youtube channel and website that you are on Steemit too. That way it's easier to know you are who you claim.
Anyways, you are allowed to post your own already-published articles over here on Steemit.
But it would be best to add a note to the top of bottom about how this is your original content, that has already been posted elsewhere on the web. Just make it quick and easy for people to tell so that they don't have to guess.
Ouch pretty harsh!! I'm SO glad you did the research to find out that @arevolution is legit. 😊 Thanks for looking out though!
What a great compliment that it was so good it looked copied! ❤
I knew this was happening, but it still burns me up to read it, and see all the evidence all over again. Thanks for sharing this!
You're welcome. Thanks for reading! I hope you watched the top video too. I give supporting information that isn't in the text.
I did finish watching the video just now. Very interesting information. Lots of new names I've never heard before..and to know the FDA gets to control our speech on the issue?? That's nauseating.
Yes it is. But I'd imagine if enough of us knew what they're up to we could change things. Hence, the reason I post about it. Thanks for watching the video. Bookmark it or something in case you ever need to explain to someone why these cures aren't allowed to surface.
Thank you for sharing!
Big Pharma doesn't need cured people, it needs patients.
Also, talking to my American friends I've come to the conclusion that it is just an illusion the US spends so much money on healthcare. It seems to me medical services are simply over-priced to create this illusion (and make some people very rich). Someone told me that for a one-day stay in the hospital the bill amounted to $27.000! For a nasty flu!
Yep. It's a scam. A big part of the reason why it's able to perpetuate is due to the fact that we're so disconnected from paying it. Most people don't pay out of pocket. They pay with insurance, medicare, or medicaid, and could care less what the hospital charges. This is yet another example of the government appearing to be trying to help but unintended consequences come along with it. If it were on a free market, that wouldn't happen. Big government is not the answer. It's the problem.
This is true. I have called the hospital and inquired about medical service prices, and also about billing. The first question the financial administrator always asks is: "Insurance, or cash price?" Seems they have a menu of services priced differently depending upon whether or not you pay in cash, out of pocket.
And I have a bill here somewhere that shows 1 single night's stay in "observation" in the E.R.
That bill is over $17,000 USD.
And they literally did nothing except watch me.
I noticed a possible inconsistency in your post, and I was wondering if you could clarify it for me. You write:
However, you also berate the FDA for taking too long to approve certain drugs. Couldn't you argue that they are just being overly cautious?
Also, how is the FDA keeping other countries from doing research on drugs?
Hey, thanks for your comment. Good questions too. To be honest, I wrote this years ago. Where did I say the FDA takes too long to approve drugs? I skimmed it a few times and didn't see it. Maybe in the video? I"m not sure sorry.
I don't know as much about how other countries operate. But the FDA only has jurisdiction here in the US. However, the pharmaceutical companies are worldwide. Other countries do allow some natural things to be used as treatment for diseases. In that way some countries are more advanced than us. So if you're out of the country you can say "xyz herb" can be used to treat cancer (if in fact it is used for that there) but it's illegal to say the same thing here, in the land of the free.
For example, a lot of the medicinal mushrooms are used in conjunction with chemo and radiation in some other countries. It mitigates a lot of the harmful effects and even makes the treatment work better. But we don't do that here. So doctors can't do it, recommend it, and that's even if they know about it, which most don't. They only know what they're taught in school and are required by law to follow procedure or risk getting their license taken away.
Hi! I am a robot. I just upvoted you! I found similar content that readers might be interested in:
http://theawarenessrevolution.com/illegal-to-cure/
Great post, you can check mine too, some basic idea on breast cancer. Please upvoat and follow if possible. Would be a great encouragement. Thanks
https://steemit.com/health/@applesspatrick/breast-cancer-stay-healthy-stay-updated-and-stay-happy