saying sugar causes cancer and ill health is like saying breathing causes death. It's a dangerous oversimplification of the pathology made by people who are lacking knowledge about the role of vitamins, minerals, and essential fatty acids. Correlation isn't causation, there are other factors at play you do not understand. I ask that you stop spouting anti-science and instead delve into the confounding variables. You'll notice that many who choose such a diet and believe this also have an inability to exercise, cognition issues, decreased motivation, and arthritis. Will you attribute all of these things to sugar even after it has been removed from ones diet?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
what an irrational comment "saying sugar causes cancer and ill health is like saying breathing causes death" breathing is essential to life sugar isn't.
You sound like you are promoting sugar... anyway i won't waste my valuable time debating on such a level.
Carbohydrates aren't essential to life? Breathing doesn't cause oxidation and cell death under certain circumstances? I am promoting the ingestion of minerals like sulfur and magnesium which prevent damage from sugars which most certainly are essential to life. On which level are you willing to debate? For I have only seen you lambast my comments without understanding them. I am telling you that you only know half the story, that sugar is dangerous like you think it is when the body is lacking sulfur and magnesium. It is that you know nothing of taurine and its antiglycation effects, that you know nothing of the role magnesium or sulfur play in preventing glycation and therefor are ill-equiped to give advice to people regarding their intake of sugar and its "dangers". Atleast speak with less surety on the matter, because your level of certainty is unwarranted