I totally agree with you. For me, I actually stand with abstainance, that's sex only after marriage. I personally feel it's the best for a relationship, so that sex no longer becomes only for pleasure, but a means for both parties to bond with each other. Then the sex will mean a lot to them.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Exactly! I'm 100% behind the sex after marriage thing. Partially because I'm LDS lol but also partially because I've seen and experienced myself firsthand how empty it becomes if you don't do it with the right person and you aren't on that same level of understanding about what sex is supposed to mean and how significant that real connection of two souls who truly love each other that much.
Ooh that's really good, am glad you are on the side of abstainance. Exactly, it becomes an empty sex when you are not with the right person. I don't really know the meaning of LDS. Actually the reason why I am for abstainance is because it is the reasonable thing to do, and also, my faith as a Christian teaches abstainance.
Ahhhh haha...LDS = The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-Day Saints. I'm Christian as well :P
Ooh,thats really great to know. Thank God you are a christian as well. Let's try as much as we can to let people know sex can be addictive.