Of course going to a dermatologist is the best way to get completely personalized care, but if you can't afford the appointments and the treatments, at least try a natural remedy first, but that's just my opinion.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
i am quite sure the visit is not so expensive, isn't it? because most of the time the main reason is hormones imbalance. no cream or remedy will help :)
Very true. Diet can play a big part in balancing hormones too. Mind if I ask what helped you the most?
i was given two choices: birth control pills or external treatments. I chose the first. one stone, two birds hahahaha
In addition, it would be good if reduce a bit diary product consumption, but i cant help myself. cheese is life, cheese is happiness *sigh
Haha efficency is great :) yes cheese is one thing I have a hard time saying no to, I did successfully cut out milk though. Glad you found a way to clear it up!
"natural == good, unnatural/unpronounceable == bad" is not sound advice.
https://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-nature
@sneak you're a smart guy but you'll need to provide a link to better info than that if you want to argue the validity of natural vs synthetic.
How about the fact that pure, high quality frankincense oil has the ability to pass the blood brain barrier. This has cured cases of brain cancer that were otherwise inoperable. Not to mention the fact that this same oil doesn't damage perfectly good healthy cells like chemo and radiation does.
I'm curious what your thoughts on that are.
The other way around. I don't have to provide a link to better info - but you do have to substantiate your claim that things are bad if they are unpronounceable. I encourage you to try, but don't spend too much time on it, because you'll fail to prove a relationship.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Null_hypothesis
e.g.: There are many survivors of disease out there who would take the argument that many "unnatural", unpronounceable things are extremely beneficial (and indeed lifesaving) for some people.
Well call me crazy then, because I believe that there's a reason for the rise in number of cancer patients... and I think there are many contributing factors, and they aren't derived from nature.
Why are you so against the notion that things exist in nature that are just as effective for some things as their synthetic counterparts?
It's a shame you can't put a patent on a naturally occurring substance, otherwise I'm sure we'd be programmed to believe that natural is better ;)
I'm using my own personal experiences with essential oils and showing how they've proven hugely beneficial to me. Not trying to start a war...