Would you like more evidence that even the drug companies recognize that these gene delivery drugs are known to cause many damaging effects to humans and are not even properly approved??
I updated the main post with extra information at the bottom. Please respond after reading the update how exactly I am gullible when the companies themselves admit to these things happening.
You need to remember only 1-10% of all of these un approved drug "severe reactions" will be reported.
Please explain how I am gullible opposed to the people that took the gene delivery drug??
See that bit, the but that refers to RRR versus ARR??
You know where that factoid came from?
An Instagram post. A slightly viral Instagram post. A post on which two separate measures are compared against one another which have nothing to do with one another.
Instagram posts are not peer reviewed scientific studies.
Excuse me, how can you read a peer reviewed study about a gene delivery drug that is still in clinical trials?
There are many peer reviewed studies on different types of transfused lipid nanoparticles and viral vector particles which is what these drugs are.
There have been very few studies released about these exact gene delivery drugs that were released under emergency use only which are still in clinical trials. We don't even know which transfection recombinant agent (reagent) was used in these gene delivery drugs.
You shouting peer reviewed studies also makes not much sense as many peer reviewed studies can be published just by paying a fee to the journal and only once they are looked at critically do they get retracted and also some articles can be redacted simply because the fee to stop it being retracted is too high.
Many peer reviewed studies come to no real meaningful conclusions on their own at all and are used to try and link up other studies and some peer reviewed studies are completely misleading or try and be ambiguous on purpose to sound better or cover up certain information.
All science is supposed to be questioned, not blindly trusted btw.
So as a person you need to comprehend and discern with a critical mind and understanding how science can be skewed with flawed or bad data.
Here is a particularly interesting scientific study on why people are suffering so badly after being injected with these exact gene delivery drugs..
What scare stories are you talking about? I am quoting no stories, this is basic knowledge of how you are supposed to look at scientific literature from the scientific community... 🤦♂️
How can there be any absolute risk reduction at all from the harmful spike protein if the gene delivery drugs are transfecting this genetic sequence into the cells to force your cells to pump out billions of harmful spike proteins?
Yes I know exactly what I am talking about this is common molecular gene expression experiment technology which I happen to know a lot about..
Transfection is used often but when used normally one would try very hard not to get the chemical agents on or in them, sadly now people are choosing to inject themselves with it because they "trust" the science.🤦♂️
How can they trust science when they know nothing about it? Surely those people are the gullible ones? This is pure cult-like behavior sadly and the cult leaders are making billions off the poor souls that choose to "believe" in science rather than understand it and know how harmful it actually is to inject themselves with these experimental gene delivery drugs.
I already explained that these gene delivery drugs can't possibly provide any absolute risk reduction because by injecting them inside you, you are putting your life at risk.
If you are saying my words are gibberish that only proves that you do not have a full grasp of the "science" of these gene delivery drugs.
Ah, yes. You happen to know a lot about this kind of stuff.. because you read memes and shit on the internet?
I am sorry, but you telling people you know a lot about this stuff doesn't win arguments. How do you know? What qualifications do you have? What have you published? What credible sources do you quote? Apart from the Instagram one. I mean I like Instagram, you can see funny pics of goats on it.
But you know "I read it on instagram/youtube etc." Doesnt make you an authority on any of this stuff.
I had no time for anti vaxxers before covid and even less now that the covid nonsense has made anti-vaxxing mainstream.
I mean look at this.
I already explained that these gene delivery drugs can't possibly provide any absolute risk reduction because by injecting them inside you, you are putting your life at risk.
You cannot conflate the risk reduction from a virus to the risk reduction from a vaccine even if it is for the virus in question. They are two separate things. Even though vax and Covid might mean the exact same thing to you. This is basic stuff.
And anyway, this isnt what you said!??!! You compared the RRR to the ARR and now you are just jumping between different things.
Please, I appeal to you. Dont just believe what they tell you. Try to understand the science behind the words what you are saying.
Anyway, goodnight old chap, you have certainly given me a fair old giggle.
Perhaps another day we can talk about the flat earth or something. LOL!
There is 0 risk from covid-19 because the natural virus does not exist.
Covid-19 is nothing more than a common detoxification process from common airborne antigens.
What happened in hospitals was also not caused by a make believe virus it was caused by misdiagnosis and medical malpractice.
The so-called sars cov 2 spike protein is what people are told is what is so harmful so now people are being told to inject themselves with a gene delivery drug that forces their cells to make the sars cov 2 spike proteins.🤦♂️
Funny thing is the sars cov 2 virus has never been isolated, and the modified messenger ribonucleic acid used to make the gene delivery drug is based on an artificially sequenced rna sequence..🤦♂️
What this means is the gene delivery drug is forcing healthy cells to go through differentiation to become enhanced antibody cells which will start pumping out a genetically modified pathogenic viral spike protein created by a synthetic non natural enzyme.
Billions of your natural cells are being altered with this modified synthetic mRNA enzyme..
This is why there is so much pain and suffering after being injected with the gene delivery drug to those that consent to being in the clinical trials right now that did not receive the placebo.
Also a higher relative risk reduction % means that your risk of getting injured goes up not down.
Absolute risk reduction the higher it is the less likely you are to get hurt and the lower it is the more likely you are to be hurt.
This is how they lie with statistics by confusing the masses..
Like when people die within 28-60 days of having a false pcr positive covid result they are classified as a covid-19 death.
We could say 50,000,000 people die every year within 28-60 days of drinking water.. we would not be stupid enough to class those deaths by drowning or "water death" but this is happening with false positive covid tests.
How does this article make me gullible?
Would you like more evidence that even the drug companies recognize that these gene delivery drugs are known to cause many damaging effects to humans and are not even properly approved??
I updated the main post with extra information at the bottom. Please respond after reading the update how exactly I am gullible when the companies themselves admit to these things happening.
You need to remember only 1-10% of all of these un approved drug "severe reactions" will be reported.
Please explain how I am gullible opposed to the people that took the gene delivery drug??
You also need to remember..
See that bit, the but that refers to RRR versus ARR??
You know where that factoid came from?
An Instagram post. A slightly viral Instagram post. A post on which two separate measures are compared against one another which have nothing to do with one another.
Instagram posts are not peer reviewed scientific studies.
So gullible, yes. Sticking with that one
Excuse me, how can you read a peer reviewed study about a gene delivery drug that is still in clinical trials?
There are many peer reviewed studies on different types of transfused lipid nanoparticles and viral vector particles which is what these drugs are.
There have been very few studies released about these exact gene delivery drugs that were released under emergency use only which are still in clinical trials. We don't even know which transfection recombinant agent (reagent) was used in these gene delivery drugs.
You shouting peer reviewed studies also makes not much sense as many peer reviewed studies can be published just by paying a fee to the journal and only once they are looked at critically do they get retracted and also some articles can be redacted simply because the fee to stop it being retracted is too high.
Many peer reviewed studies come to no real meaningful conclusions on their own at all and are used to try and link up other studies and some peer reviewed studies are completely misleading or try and be ambiguous on purpose to sound better or cover up certain information.
All science is supposed to be questioned, not blindly trusted btw.
So as a person you need to comprehend and discern with a critical mind and understanding how science can be skewed with flawed or bad data.
Here is a particularly interesting scientific study on why people are suffering so badly after being injected with these exact gene delivery drugs..
https://www.news-medical.net/news/20210315/Research-looks-at-inflammatory-nature-of-lipid-nanoparticle-component-in-mRNA-vaccines.aspx
Honestly.. You are just quoting words from random scare stories on the net.
It would be hilariously funny if it wasn't hilariously sad
What scare stories are you talking about? I am quoting no stories, this is basic knowledge of how you are supposed to look at scientific literature from the scientific community... 🤦♂️
Come on. Why have we stopped talking about/quoting the 'viral' Instagram post?
Lol
How can there be any absolute risk reduction at all from the harmful spike protein if the gene delivery drugs are transfecting this genetic sequence into the cells to force your cells to pump out billions of harmful spike proteins?
transfecting
This is too good. Do you actually know what any of what you are saying means?
Apart from the absolute gibberish above, what do you have to say to your quoting of the Instagram name as science fact?
Yes I know exactly what I am talking about this is common molecular gene expression experiment technology which I happen to know a lot about..
Transfection is used often but when used normally one would try very hard not to get the chemical agents on or in them, sadly now people are choosing to inject themselves with it because they "trust" the science.🤦♂️
How can they trust science when they know nothing about it? Surely those people are the gullible ones? This is pure cult-like behavior sadly and the cult leaders are making billions off the poor souls that choose to "believe" in science rather than understand it and know how harmful it actually is to inject themselves with these experimental gene delivery drugs.
I already explained that these gene delivery drugs can't possibly provide any absolute risk reduction because by injecting them inside you, you are putting your life at risk.
If you are saying my words are gibberish that only proves that you do not have a full grasp of the "science" of these gene delivery drugs.
Ah, yes. You happen to know a lot about this kind of stuff.. because you read memes and shit on the internet?
I am sorry, but you telling people you know a lot about this stuff doesn't win arguments. How do you know? What qualifications do you have? What have you published? What credible sources do you quote? Apart from the Instagram one. I mean I like Instagram, you can see funny pics of goats on it.
But you know "I read it on instagram/youtube etc." Doesnt make you an authority on any of this stuff.
I had no time for anti vaxxers before covid and even less now that the covid nonsense has made anti-vaxxing mainstream.
I mean look at this.
You cannot conflate the risk reduction from a virus to the risk reduction from a vaccine even if it is for the virus in question. They are two separate things. Even though vax and Covid might mean the exact same thing to you. This is basic stuff.
And anyway, this isnt what you said!??!! You compared the RRR to the ARR and now you are just jumping between different things.
Please, I appeal to you. Dont just believe what they tell you. Try to understand the science behind the words what you are saying.
Anyway, goodnight old chap, you have certainly given me a fair old giggle.
Perhaps another day we can talk about the flat earth or something. LOL!
There is 0 risk from covid-19 because the natural virus does not exist.
Covid-19 is nothing more than a common detoxification process from common airborne antigens.
What happened in hospitals was also not caused by a make believe virus it was caused by misdiagnosis and medical malpractice.
The so-called sars cov 2 spike protein is what people are told is what is so harmful so now people are being told to inject themselves with a gene delivery drug that forces their cells to make the sars cov 2 spike proteins.🤦♂️
Funny thing is the sars cov 2 virus has never been isolated, and the modified messenger ribonucleic acid used to make the gene delivery drug is based on an artificially sequenced rna sequence..🤦♂️
What this means is the gene delivery drug is forcing healthy cells to go through differentiation to become enhanced antibody cells which will start pumping out a genetically modified pathogenic viral spike protein created by a synthetic non natural enzyme.
Billions of your natural cells are being altered with this modified synthetic mRNA enzyme..
This is why there is so much pain and suffering after being injected with the gene delivery drug to those that consent to being in the clinical trials right now that did not receive the placebo.
Also a higher relative risk reduction % means that your risk of getting injured goes up not down.
Absolute risk reduction the higher it is the less likely you are to get hurt and the lower it is the more likely you are to be hurt.
This is how they lie with statistics by confusing the masses..
Like when people die within 28-60 days of having a false pcr positive covid result they are classified as a covid-19 death.
We could say 50,000,000 people die every year within 28-60 days of drinking water.. we would not be stupid enough to class those deaths by drowning or "water death" but this is happening with false positive covid tests.