My very close friend was the one who had five antibiotics prescriptions from the same doctor in one year. When she then got strep throat, she almost died because they couldn't do anything for her. Yet, there was nothing done by any authority to question the doctors conduct. I don't need any evidence to know what I'm saying is right. I used to get PAID to help cover up lies and deceit by the pharma. Sorry, but if they wouldn't harm anyone, there would be no reason to cover up anything don't you think? I am also the parent of a vaccine injured child but of course, for people like you all those stories would just be coincidences, but they're not. I hope you'll never have to deal with any of that, because I wouldn't wish it on anyone and our case was by far not as bad as some. There are many, many whistleblowers in the field of pharma and the medical world too. And when you say that you don't believe that vaccines can and will harm, you're actually telling me that those HUGE amounts of vaccinations entering a newborn baby's bloodstream (sometimes 6 or 8 at the time) are actually a good thing? Even without a medical degree people could figure out that that can never be ok. Believing what I believe is toxic, but bombarding a young infant with that many vaccines all at once when the child never had the chance to build its natural immunity is not? Maybe you should read that again...Or better even: Read the INSERTS of all vaccines and tell me again that they can't harm. If you would have, you wouldn't say that! Actually, it is mandatory for parents to receive the inserts of the vaccine before they're administered. Now if you know only ONE person who's actually received one without asking, that'll be huge. Because they usually don't give them to people, I wonder why... Look, I'm not here to convince anyone. If people want to vaccinate their family, that's up to them and the other way around. But I'm sure that even when they choose to vaccinate, they'd still want to be informed properly of all pros and cons, read the insert and maybe have the vaccines spread out more instead of all in one go. You have to agree that would be better than what it is now?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Great. Thank you for your time then.
Just a question: have you read any of the inserts? And of course, if you really have evidence as you described, I'd be more than happy to read it.
I have read the inserts and risks. Here's a good FAQ from the CDC which I'm confident you will dismiss.
Yeah, I know the FAQ from the CDC inside and out. But if you did read the inserts and risks then how can you say that vaccines can't possibly harm? I mean, the makers of these vaccines are even telling you in those inserts that they can, so how can you deny it? Especially since you are all hunky dory about the info they provide.
From earlier:
Sure doesn't feel like it at this point with how much effort you've committed so far.
As predicted, dismissed.
I didn't say they couldn't possibly harm. It's just that the risks aren't enough to avoid vaccines or even spread/delay them. You're simply misinformed.
The difference between us is I could be convinced otherwise with proper evidence. That's how science works. It's not based on faith or gut feelings.
Well, you told me that if I believe that vaccines could possibly harm that I was wrong, your words, not mine. So with that you were definitely saying there were no risks. I don't base anything on faith or gut feelings. Like I said: I used to be paid to cover up...that's a hard and terrible fact for me, and something I have to live with. And from that point, I know for 100% surety that doctors, scientists, and anyone who has anything to do with the approval or continuance of any medication or vaccine are also paid and bribed to cover this up. Yeah, of course not all, but either way: these BILLION dollar companies get their way. I have never said that vaccines could have never saved lives, because I know that at some stage, there are and always have been people who are actually trying to help people, but I DO think it is important for people to be informed properly and receive an insert BEFORE vaccination. And as far as it goes about me committing the amount of effort that I spent on this so far: yes, I am passionate about what I believe in and will never apologise for that. And again: the AMOUNT of vaccines given at once is unreal. It is more than an adult should get, let alone a baby. And there is a tetanus shot given here in Ireland at 2 and 3 months. Do you really think that's necessary unless the child lives on the ground and can get into contact with anything rusty or dirt that could give it tetanus? Sorry, but from raising 4 children, I know for a fact that these worries won't come up until much later. And even then, there are things one can do to prevent it from happening. Like: not let a toddler play with rusty nails. There is no denying this, tetanus could be given later, without any problems...ever. So if you still think that all these vaccinations need to be given at the same time, then you're worse off than I thought. The fluoride is working...
Got it. Fluoride.
Oh, just one more thing: I didn't dismiss the CDC FAQ at all, what I said was that I KNOW it inside and out. A student won't read a book that he already knows, would he? Neither would I, unless new content gets added.