Still, the FDA has not prohibited its use in food and beverages because “the scientific consensus is that the mechanism of carcinogenicity in rats is not applicable in humans.”
OK so they are not allowed to test it in humans, but the results in rats are inadmissible as proof? the burden of proof of safety becomes burden of proof of harm laid on the consumers, who have shown that the harms of great. But those were not double blind fucking studies or whatever, so that proof is inadmissible. We are so screwed.
Doctors NEVER advise their patients to stop eating this poison. The problem is not one requiring more regulation, more regulation will do nothing. The problem is that our doctors are woefully overeducated to do nothing more than to prescribe meds for ailments. They have NO IDEA WHATSOEVER about what causes disease in the first place.