If by speaking out Doc A ends his career, is he really going to speak out?
pharmaceutical companies are known to make generous donations to universities. So, basically these studies are funded by those who stand to profit from results in their favour.
There is a long list of rich people with sick children. Autism particularly. Which didn't exist before vaccines. People drive cars to work every day knowing there is a risk, but their desire for money blinds them from the risk.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
A person of ethics, yes i do think they would. Most docs i know did not get into solely for the money, rather they do truely care about people.
Sure they make donations, but do you know they spend millions on research that goes no were. I don't have quite a bleak out look on all corps.
Vaccines do not cause autism. There were many cases of it prior to us using them.
https://www.autismspeaks.org/science/science-news/no-mmr-autism-link-large-study-vaccinated-vs-unvaccinated-kids
https://www.google.com/amp/s/geneticliteracyproject.org/2016/09/22/autism-increase-mystery-solved-no-its-not-vaccines-gmos-glyphosate-or-organic-foods/amp/
The one study that claimed vaccienes did, was retracted and show to be completely false. By peer reviews. People have a concern for mercury in vaccines, well there is not mercury in them. Thimerosal was a mercury based preservative that was removed due to there being a thought that it might do harm. In this case, the system worked. The flu vaccine is the only one i know of that still uses it. If you don't get a flu shot, so what.