If we argue, let's due it based on some scientific facts.
You must understand that I can't take the US law system for too serious - so many absolutely ridiculous decisions I have heard of.
And while the vaccines story from above is nice and probably correct, it's not comparabale to the vaccines which helped significantely lower the case reports for many deadly diseases in the 20th century.
That would be like comparing the first cars built to the ones we have today.
And yes, vaccines have side effects, and yes, there is crime going on regarding vaccines. We can agree that we should aim to get safer vaccines and that the crime (forcing to vaxx, testing on kids in Africa, ...) has to stop. But those crimes are not the fault of vaccines. It's the fault of those who do those crimes. So they have to be stopped, not vaccines.
The safety of vaccines is irrelevant. They are unnecessary. The historical timeline shows that the decline of many infectious diseases, which have been misattributed to vaccines, started well before the widespread use of vaccines. Further evidence can be seen as other diseases, for which the are not vaccines, also declined, all due to developments in sanitation, hygiene, and nutrition.
There are also technologies superior to vaccines available to any who are interested in looking.