RE: Children Vaccinated At Birth For Hepatitis B in Australia! Why?

[theaustrianguy]

I am not saying that there is absolutely no link. There may be, I don't know for sure. But neither do the experts of those studies.

@the first link:
https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2009/09/17/another-weak-study-proves-vaccines-cause-autism/
https://leftbrainrightbrain.co.uk/2010/09/16/autism-causation-and-the-hepatitis-b-vaccine-no-link/
http://www.harpocratesspeaks.com/2013/05/mind-institute-no-difference-in.html

@ your second link, even the paper itsself says: "Clearly, we cannot draw definite conclusions regarding the link be- tween Al adjuvants and autism based on an ecological study such as the present one and hence the validity of our results remains to be con- firmed."

The third link is not even working...

Comments

[llball]

Vaccine court ruled in favor of link between MMR vaccine and autism in case of a Harvard Medical Dr. who's child became autistic as a result of the vaccine. This Dr. was involved in neuroscience and his child was involved in a study of his where brain imaging was involved prior to the receipt of the vaccine. So he was in a position that most other parents aren't as he had the before and after images of her brain to prove the damage.

[teamsteem]

Clearly, we cannot draw definite conclusions regarding the link be-
tween Al adjuvants and autism based on an ecological study such as the present one and hence the validity of our results remains to be confirmed.

Is followed by:

A case control study with detailed examination of vaccination records and Al body burden measurements (i.e., hair, urine, blood) in autistic and a control group of children would be one step toward this goal. Nonetheless, given that the scientific evidence appears to indicate that vaccine safety is not as firmly established as often believed, it would seem ill advised to exclude pediatric vaccinations as a possible cause of adverse long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes, including those associated with autism. We have thus provided a hypothesis which we hope will encourage future research into this area in order to resolve the issue of whether or not vaccines might be responsible in some part for thegrowing prevalence of autism in the developed world. Such future research should consider the following: (i) the postnatal period represents a very sensitive phase in development during which the physiology of the nervous as well as the immune system can be influenced and sometimes permanently changed Al is a neurotoxin and a strong immune adjuvant (Table 1), hence Al has all the necessary biochemical properties to induce neurological and immune
disorders; and (iii) autism is a multisystem disorder characterized by dysfunctional immunity and impaired brain function
[17,20,22].Because the current safety data for Al exposure in infants and children is unsatisfactory and because this demographic represents those who may be most at risk for complications following vaccination, a more rigorous evaluation of Al adjuvant safety than what has been provided to date seemswarranted.

I didn't post these studies to prove anything. You asked for some studies and I provided some.

I'm not sure had read what followed what you had quote but the rest of the quote clearly state the concern of the researchers.

The lead researcher published quite a lot of studies since then. Yeah sure I don't doubt you can't find counter studies to her and that's okay.

https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Lucija_Tomljenovic/publications