You are viewing a single comment's thread from:

RE: HF21 Addition: Vote Window Change

in #hf216 years ago

Well, around these days in which there is so much talk about attract new investors, recruit new developers, onboard new people, open new accounts and such in our ecosystem. I just had a ¿crazy? idea.

What about if the Stinc Devs simply code up and merge in the changes into the release candidate of the upcoming Hardfork 21 a simpler 'Curation' algorithm?

Hmm, well, I dunno... but, for example:

If they just forget everything about “vote windows” and shit. And just focus on add a piece of code where only resteeming a post allows Curation Rewards?

I mean, forget everyone who want to call themselves "Curators" of earning not even half shit from curation rewards by 'upvoting' a post in the first minute no matter how big their VP or SP is.

Anyone who'd want to extract from the public rewards pool a single dime and is expecting to get profits for their devoted Curation efforts. From now on, they will have to resteem a post!! Because only exerting your true role as a curator by executing a resteem would be the only way to have a ROI.

Yeah! correct, I admit it! There is no do$h available for authors either from a resteem. But who cares? Re-steeming means Curation.
You may always upvote the post after you have READ it completely from top to bottom to throw your two cents in the authors hat. ¿right?

Uhm, I just wonder how many new steem accounts would be instantly created and how many new 'peeps avatars' we would get to interact with the steem blockchain through their active Curator's re-steems if my 'crazy' proposal is heard & evaluated?

I bet that at least a few thousands new Alt accounts that will resteem "curate content" would be created. But yeah, no doubt they would be the same usual suspects with enough steem dough & high SP to claim them and pay for them.

Cheers!! :)