A great deal and there would be no single people who questioned this creationism were the names of a single person. And in the 19th century thanks to Lamarck and Darwin in biology, as a result, such more rigorous proven representations about natural selection about the evolution of living beings are being formed where a person is viewed as one of the links in the general evolution of living nature, and then there is this here is the contrast between the traditional creationist paradigm and the evolutionary paradigm for a while I think and in the dispute wore here more or less phil osofskiy character but my position is such that now This dispute in the morning 6:00 the amount of accumulated facts is such that today but I think we can say that the evolutionist position is proven Well maybe not 100% but 99 there and 99 That's for sure and here Probably already is to still stay closer still to something tested by a reliable scientific and to struggle with a different kind here with myths of superstition prejudice to fulfill such a historical mission. In the sense of philosophy here What myths exist that are prevalent in t in the ordinary consciousness for example that a Man has occurred A man has descended from a monkey then this is so they do not quite so here in the first place
Sort: Trending