The rumour A.H. have had just one testicle is going around until today. Even Ian Kershaw feels compelled to write a stub about it in his 2000 pages strong biography, which is counted into the core literature about German national-socialism and its leader. The two pages about the Fuehrer’s genitals (compared to the rest of his leading work not even a side topic) is: bullshit! But Kershaw also tries to keep scientific demands even on this. He fights his opinion critically and correctly by funding his clear objections on this point with arguments and proofs versus the only known “reference”: the autopsy of Hitler’s turned to charcoal mortal remains in the Soviet Union. Neither the medical examinations, A.H. had to undergo serving in the Bavarian army during the First World War nor his later medical documentation, which are examples for Teutonic thoroughness by noticing every tiny mental(!) and physical illness carefully (just to dispel every supposition, the files could have been whitewashed), offer a proof for a special therapy in this part of his body. The rumour goes around since the end of WW2 and appears, together with new “evidences”, ever again. They depend only on the sensationalism and the "Hitler-effect" in the yellow press and people having heard something through the grapevine or Internet.