I don’t like Imran Khan, but that doesn’t mean I support Nawaz Sharif or Jamat-e-Islami either. In my opinion, all of them are equally bad in their own ways.
Also, I want to clarify that this is just my personal opinion. It’s possible that my perspective is because of limited knowledge, and I could be wrong. I’m open to learning more and changing my views.
If I were to recommend a Bollywood movie, I would suggest Dunki. However, you don’t need to watch it. Instead, you can look into the context of why Shah Rukh Khan’s character in the movie refused to apply for asylum, even when the judge suggested he claim there was a threat to his life in India. In the film, his friend dies, and the narrative implies that India is unsafe, though the friend actually committed suicide.
This reflects a common issue where people use manipulative tactics to gain entry into other countries, often undermining the credibility of genuine asylum cases.
Now, if you were a Pakistani watching Malala Yousafzai’s story unfold on the news, it might remind you of the kind of situation depicted in Dunki. Many people with common sense could see parallels. Malala criticized her country and received significant foreign support.
I remember watching the news coverage live when she was allegedly shot. Strangely, when she was being airlifted by helicopter, there were no visible bullet wounds, and she walked unaided to board the helicopter. I don’t recall all the details, but there was a lot of speculation about photo editing, retakes, and video manipulation to alter the narrative. Unfortunately, it seemed like the government was involved in shaping the story. Some even speculate that she could be an agent for Pakistan, sent to spy on other countries or perhaps even a double agent. Who knows?
But she was treated in a British hospital in UK. Are you saying the British government took part to help the Pakistani government fake the whole thing?
Let’s assume that British hospitals are a credible way to verify whether an incident is real or fake. However, there are cases, like when police officers are shot by their own colleagues to stage a scenario, claim it was a terrorist attack, and gain promotions that raise questions about the truth behind certain events. I won’t go into details, but you get the idea.
Similarly, in Malala’s case, it’s possible that she was genuinely shot and received treatment in a British hospital. However, the question of who shot her remains controversial for me.
I understand this might sound like another conspiracy theory, and I acknowledge there’s a higher chance I could be wrong. Still, I don’t look up to Malala as an idol or a role model. While she might genuinely be a good person, my doubts persist due to the controversies surrounding her story.
If I am applying for a government job, and the person hiring me asks if Malala is a good person, I would answer that she is not. Even in this scenario, I would not praise her. I am willing to lose my position as a commission officer rather than praise her.
Don't believe everything this dude says :)
Ask him about Imran Khan and lets see how he answers :)
Hint: trick question
Double hint: I already know how he will answer.
I don’t like Imran Khan, but that doesn’t mean I support Nawaz Sharif or Jamat-e-Islami either. In my opinion, all of them are equally bad in their own ways.
Also, I want to clarify that this is just my personal opinion. It’s possible that my perspective is because of limited knowledge, and I could be wrong. I’m open to learning more and changing my views.
If I were to recommend a Bollywood movie, I would suggest Dunki. However, you don’t need to watch it. Instead, you can look into the context of why Shah Rukh Khan’s character in the movie refused to apply for asylum, even when the judge suggested he claim there was a threat to his life in India. In the film, his friend dies, and the narrative implies that India is unsafe, though the friend actually committed suicide.
This reflects a common issue where people use manipulative tactics to gain entry into other countries, often undermining the credibility of genuine asylum cases.
Now, if you were a Pakistani watching Malala Yousafzai’s story unfold on the news, it might remind you of the kind of situation depicted in Dunki. Many people with common sense could see parallels. Malala criticized her country and received significant foreign support.
I remember watching the news coverage live when she was allegedly shot. Strangely, when she was being airlifted by helicopter, there were no visible bullet wounds, and she walked unaided to board the helicopter. I don’t recall all the details, but there was a lot of speculation about photo editing, retakes, and video manipulation to alter the narrative. Unfortunately, it seemed like the government was involved in shaping the story. Some even speculate that she could be an agent for Pakistan, sent to spy on other countries or perhaps even a double agent. Who knows?
Above text is translated from Urdu to English
But she was treated in a British hospital in UK. Are you saying the British government took part to help the Pakistani government fake the whole thing?
Let’s assume that British hospitals are a credible way to verify whether an incident is real or fake. However, there are cases, like when police officers are shot by their own colleagues to stage a scenario, claim it was a terrorist attack, and gain promotions that raise questions about the truth behind certain events. I won’t go into details, but you get the idea.
Similarly, in Malala’s case, it’s possible that she was genuinely shot and received treatment in a British hospital. However, the question of who shot her remains controversial for me.
I understand this might sound like another conspiracy theory, and I acknowledge there’s a higher chance I could be wrong. Still, I don’t look up to Malala as an idol or a role model. While she might genuinely be a good person, my doubts persist due to the controversies surrounding her story.
If I am applying for a government job, and the person hiring me asks if Malala is a good person, I would answer that she is not. Even in this scenario, I would not praise her. I am willing to lose my position as a commission officer rather than praise her.
This is a hypothetical scenario.