A few points:
You don't need a super majority for a softfork to lock up stake. You just need a normal majority. (Longest chain wins).
It's funny how many people throw around 1SP1 Vote, or reduce to three votes etc without doing the math right now.
If we have 1 SP 1 Vote we will have much less vote overlap than what we have now which makes it much easier for a big stake to push multiple witnesses in the top 20. This way Justin would easy be able to get always not only 5 witnesses but a majority of witnesses in the top 20.
This is not even close to decentralization.
I focused only on the number to prevent hard fork, as it seems that that is the number 22.2 witnesses cared
I have done the math and showed the logic. Not sure what you mean here.
If you think you have math proof, please write it. At least from what I analyzed, the current system is much easier for big whales to dominate, as we have seen that after 22.5 justin alone took all top 20.
I did a short analysis:
https://steemit.com/steem/@raycoms/witness-voting-schemes-an-analysis
It is not "short"! thank you for your posting - it seems that I need to read it tomorrow when I got some free time.
For me defense, I could've made a 10 page double column paper out of this =D
I expect you to use LaTeX when you do that =)
What else? =D
Can someone do a simulation? I'm curious what happens.
If it's a bad idea trust me... Justin's crew will find out and use it against us and we won't manage to convince the Koreans that it's a stupid idea without some solid math.
Could someone simulate a few 1sp 1vote scenarios.