Who is the designated left forward player? His name is Martinelli. Abeg I nor dey like to dey hide matters.
Trossard you are saying now, is a testament to the fact that Martinelli hasn't been at the races in recent times. Even Trossard wasn't deputising consistently well for Martinelli, until very recently.
Firstly, let me look at the matter ordinarily, Asensio has been signed by Villa, amd he was a beauty to watch this night, does it mean Villa didn't have good wingers? So what’s wrong with Trossard and Grealish for the left wing?
You are the one that mentioned Trossard when the whole world knows that Arsenal’s designated left winger is Martinelli. Meaning you are sincere enough to admit that Martinelli isn't up to it. If he is not up to it as a first choice, what are you keeping him on as a second choice for? Is this not a big club again?
Secondly if I may continue from where I left off in the second paragraph. Trossard is used by Arteta as a utility player. It's not that he has cemented any role as his just yet, he's just being doing well on the left, very very recently. Good for him.
And let me be direct with you, no please Grealish and Trossard ain't alike. Grealish is a specialist left winger and he creates more problems for a defence than Trossard. Forget the inhibited version of Grealish you see in Man City, that guy is like a Mitoma in full flow. That's why he wants to leave City this coming summer.
Other thing is that, I like his attitude to work, a quality Arteta treasures. No City player trains harder a longer than Grealish, absolutely no City player. This is a fact, that is on record. You buy him and you are buying a motivated player who wants to win his England shirt back, plus as an English boy sometimes having a son of the soil in your team helps against some corrupt refs.
Finally whether one thinks Grealish is a better option than Trossard or not isn't the even the crux of the matter. The crux is, what’s wrong with having Trossard and Grealish on the left?
Plus Grealish will be cheaper than the Atletic Bilbao's star player, Williams, and Grealish is well tested in England, so he would hit the ground running.
Big clubs think ruthlessly to win trophies. If Grealish was even brought in, in January(which would have been much much easier than bringing in Watkins), then Harvetz and Trossard could have been alternating that number 9 role. Harvetz is not really a striker, overplaying him there is not good for him and the team.
Who is the designated left forward player? His name is Martinelli. Abeg I nor dey like to dey hide matters.
Trossard you are saying now, is a testament to the fact that Martinelli hasn't been at the races in recent times. Even Trossard wasn't deputising consistently well for Martinelli, until very recently.
Firstly, let me look at the matter ordinarily, Asensio has been signed by Villa, amd he was a beauty to watch this night, does it mean Villa didn't have good wingers? So what’s wrong with Trossard and Grealish for the left wing?
You are the one that mentioned Trossard when the whole world knows that Arsenal’s designated left winger is Martinelli. Meaning you are sincere enough to admit that Martinelli isn't up to it. If he is not up to it as a first choice, what are you keeping him on as a second choice for? Is this not a big club again?
Secondly if I may continue from where I left off in the second paragraph. Trossard is used by Arteta as a utility player. It's not that he has cemented any role as his just yet, he's just being doing well on the left, very very recently. Good for him.
And let me be direct with you, no please Grealish and Trossard ain't alike. Grealish is a specialist left winger and he creates more problems for a defence than Trossard. Forget the inhibited version of Grealish you see in Man City, that guy is like a Mitoma in full flow. That's why he wants to leave City this coming summer.
Other thing is that, I like his attitude to work, a quality Arteta treasures. No City player trains harder a longer than Grealish, absolutely no City player. This is a fact, that is on record. You buy him and you are buying a motivated player who wants to win his England shirt back, plus as an English boy sometimes having a son of the soil in your team helps against some corrupt refs.
Finally whether one thinks Grealish is a better option than Trossard or not isn't the even the crux of the matter. The crux is, what’s wrong with having Trossard and Grealish on the left?
Plus Grealish will be cheaper than the Atletic Bilbao's star player, Williams, and Grealish is well tested in England, so he would hit the ground running.
Big clubs think ruthlessly to win trophies. If Grealish was even brought in, in January(which would have been much much easier than bringing in Watkins), then Harvetz and Trossard could have been alternating that number 9 role. Harvetz is not really a striker, overplaying him there is not good for him and the team.