My return proposal is just like any other proposal, it's not some hardcoded concept, I was just trying submit it ASAP (still, manually), so it has first id: 0. It has ridiculously big amount of daily pay, to be sure that it can consume everything that is not consumed earlier (i.e. by proposals voted higher than that).
And support for this proposal is also usual, that is, mechanism same as for any other proposal: people are voting for it (or not).
Currently it might be better to vote for one of the HBD stabilizer proposal to play such "threshold" role, because not only it will return those funds back to DHF, but in the meantime it will help with the HBD.
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
Oh, thanks, interesting point. However, there are some things I still don't get: do you mean to say "Return proposal" is not hard coded but simply, through its "ridiculously big amount", it "crowds out" the proposals underneath ? In that case, it doesn't provide a "cut off" and the proposals below it still receive "a trickle" of funds ? Also, the "Hive Gamification Proposal" is above the Return proposal but in the peakd display it appears that it still doesn't receive funding - how comes?
DHF has some funds (x) to spend every hour, it goes from top to bottom (votes count) until x = 0.
If it will reach my proposal having x > 0 then my proposal will get all what's left (amount is really big enough for that) and send it back to DHF.
Currently however, HBD stabilizer proposal has a daily pay so big that it eats what's left from x, so neither gamification proposal or return proposal are funded.
Thanks, much clearer now!
So voting for this proposal makes it harder for people to grift?