How does Hive exist as social when all chat happens on Discord? Isn't that a very important feature missing?
This is why I wonder, can CHAT even be implemented on this or any Blockchain? Since Resource Credits are a must for activity, does the RC system limit the existence of a robust and active chat between users?
Also I get your point about the Facebook statement but "buidl" needs a person to know "hodl" or they just see it as a bad (and somewhat embarrassing) typo.
Beyond Face books. Stories on blockchain: HIVE"
has more depth and relevance.
But my question of chat is the only point.
Is @blocktrades and the coming HF prioritising chat on the chain at some point? If not isn't this going to always exist as a major limit to any type of onboarding. How do you "leader" people expect masses to migrate to a system/platform that has basic features missing or fragmented to the point that a person needs to learn various systems and manage multiple identities/login details?
That's not Web 3.0
That's spider web for real.. a sticky mess!
There were experiments in the past with a chat on the block chain. It is quite slow. So that feature if implemented would need more speed and more power. We have DM personal messages memos that could be used for the same purpose. But again it would be very slow.
That's a major flaw then.
Which makes it embarrassing to claim Web 3.0 is superior. How on earth does Hive onboard masses and expect them to choose this over 2.0 that can handle on-demand group chat as a basic feature.
Btw are you my new admirer?
Kind of odd that you're engaging me on multiple posts. Lol not really odd just funny.
Being decentralized makes it so. I am engaging with discussions that have inviting titles for me. For now Im mobile so scrolling is pain, I follow what is easier to find. I usually comment on only few users per day from my notification tab.
Lol 'decentralised' is fluff.
Masses don't care about that.
There's many posts here that have revealed that either through their own research or by just realising that the active user numbers is declining NOT growing. Also the clear fact that while the mainstream platforms are censoring and banning many. These self-proclaimed superior platforms aren't where they migrate to.
The main reason: this is no where near finished or able to handle mass. Also there really is no great content or enough content to retain attention. That is blatantly obvious but no one here wants to even speak about it.
BELIEVE! Is mandatory.
and i point at speed as a problem here chat should be instant
this was not built with that in mind, more as a blog social posting but not chat
user number fluctuate and engaging content is either hard to find or majority of ppl just don’t engage bc they are not here for that or they don’t want to bc appreciation towards $ is greater than the debate in which they can lose ( spelling is horrible bc im on mobile)
Well there's the meat of the flaws.
How is it that this is Web 3.0 then.
It just isn't. Potential isn't actuality.
Blockchain just isn't ready to replace regular systems. Only coders think that because coders compare code to code. Plus they're reclusive types so discord chat is how they want to keep it.
Tiktok is the frontier.
It's at least 5 years away as a Blockchain replicated system though. I only see Blockchain as a record keeper. It's like DNA. BC is a while away from manifesting complex organisms. Right now it's just single cell jelly-fish existing as "dapps" but that D is a falsehood. And "app" not even true either. Some are just closed communities utilising a pretend-value token.
Hey let's create that.. BELIEVE Token.
I give you:
!ENGAGE 10
and
!BELIEVE 1000000000
You need to have 1000 ENGAGE, in order to use this service.
Back when partiko was running, they had an integrated chat service and it worked perfectly. I'm not a dev so i'm sure there are issues to doing it but at the same time. I am sure it can be done.