De facto almost any type of voting (also for DHF) is already stake-based, isn´t it? Most of the witnesses who are whales are in the top 20. Coincidence only?
You are viewing a single comment's thread from:
De facto almost any type of voting (also for DHF) is already stake-based, isn´t it? Most of the witnesses who are whales are in the top 20. Coincidence only?
Well it's conflicted in this scenario, someone may want to vote for a witness but they're signaling either too high or too low APR. I.e. why should it be the job of witnesses to handle the economics of HBD when everyone could vote on it themselves specifically instead. It would also avoid certain scenarios I imagine have occurred where witnesses may signal higher or lower not based on what they think is best for hive but what they think is best for their position which doesn't sound like a great model to uphold.
Agree on this one.