AMD Claims Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Outperforms Intel Core Ultra 7 258V by 75% in Gaming Performance
In the ongoing battle for supremacy in mobile graphics performance, AMD has once again emerged victorious, according to recent performance benchmarks shared by the company. The AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370, equipped with its integrated Radeon 890 iGPU, is reportedly 75% faster in gaming performance than Intel’s Core Ultra 7 258V processor when paired with FSR 3 (FidelityFX Super Resolution 3).
AMD’s latest benchmarks, which compare its high-end Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 to Intel’s rival Core Ultra 7 258V, highlight substantial performance gains in a variety of popular titles, demonstrating why AMD continues to dominate the integrated graphics market in mobile computing.
Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 vs. Intel Core Ultra 7 258V: A 75% Gaming Advantage
According to the newly released benchmarks, AMD’s Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 delivers up to a 75% improvement in gaming performance compared to Intel’s Core Ultra 7 258V, especially with AMD’s FSR 3 technology activated. The comparison, which includes several gaming titles tested at 1080p resolution with medium presets, shows AMD’s processor outperforming Intel's counterpart by over 50 FPS in titles like F1 24, Far Cry 6, Forza Horizon 5, Doom Eternal, and Call of Duty: Black Ops 6. In other games, the performance gap between the two processors is often greater than 30 FPS.
This performance leap reinforces AMD's reputation for delivering exceptional integrated graphics in mobile computing, particularly in gaming-heavy tasks where every frame matters. With these benchmarks, AMD's Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 is poised to solidify its place as the go-to choice for gamers and mobile users who prioritize high performance without relying on discrete graphics cards.
The Role of FSR 3 and AMD’s Upscaling Technology
A key factor behind the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370’s superior performance is the integration of AMD’s FSR 3, which provides a significant boost to frame rates by utilizing a frame-generation algorithm. AMD’s proprietary upscaling technology has been a major selling point for the company, allowing gamers to enjoy higher frame rates and smoother gameplay even on devices with integrated graphics.
On the other hand, Intel’s Core Ultra 7 258V has been utilizing XeSS (Xe Super Sampling), Intel's own upscaling technology, to enhance gaming performance. However, according to AMD’s latest data, the performance boost provided by XeSS lags behind FSR 3, with AMD’s technology offering more than double the performance improvement in select titles.
AMD’s claim that FSR 3 with frame generation is available in over 95 games—and the broader FSR technology is now supported in more than 415 titles—further cements its competitive edge in the market. For comparison, Intel’s XeSS is only available in approximately 130 titles, a notable disparity for gamers who prioritize technology adoption and game compatibility.
The Advantage of AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 (AFMF 2)
When paired with AMD Fluid Motion Frames 2 (AFMF 2), the performance gap between the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 and Intel’s Core Ultra 7 258V grows even wider. AMD’s AFMF 2 technology further enhances frame rate generation and video playback smoothness, creating a noticeable edge in gaming experiences and multimedia performance.
AMD also noted that when the Intel CPU was tested using FSR 3, the performance gains were not as pronounced as with the Ryzen AI 9 HX 370. This suggests that AMD’s ecosystem, including both its hardware and software technologies, is more finely tuned to maximize gaming performance, particularly when leveraging its proprietary features like AFMF 2.
A Look Ahead: AMD's Commitment to Gaming Performance
AMD’s emphasis on its integrated graphics solutions, powered by its cutting-edge FSR 3 and AFMF 2 technologies, positions the company as a leader in the mobile gaming space. With these technologies not only improving frame rates but also offering significant gains in visual fidelity, AMD is clearly looking to capitalize on the growing demand for high-performance gaming laptops and devices.
As for Intel, the company’s XeSS technology remains competitive, but it will need to close the gap with AMD’s FSR 3 and Fluid Motion Frames if it hopes to reclaim the performance crown in integrated graphics. Intel has yet to fully leverage the potential of its Arc GPUs in this arena, leaving room for AMD to strengthen its lead.
Future Prospects: AMD’s Ongoing Battle with Intel and Beyond
The battle for integrated mobile graphics performance is far from over. As both AMD and Intel continue to innovate and improve their technologies, consumers can expect even more competitive offerings in the coming months. AMD’s strategic use of FSR 3 and AFMF 2, paired with its powerful Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 processor, ensures that the company will remain a dominant force in the mobile gaming market.
For now, AMD’s recent performance benchmarks have set the bar high, proving that the company is not only ahead in the race for mobile processor performance but also shaping the future of integrated graphics in the gaming world.
https://HTOsports.com/PHLENGLAMKHAMKHUEANKAEOEP8
https://HTOsports.com/PLUTO-EP5
https://HTOsports.com/JEONGNYEONTHESTARISBORNEP11THAISUB
https://HTOsports.com/LERAIGAMELUANGEP5